Views differ considerably when it comes to the issue of the responsibility of corporations. While some people believe that the responsibility of a corporation is limited to make as much money as possible, others assert that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Both of the opposite argument appears to be somewhat convincing and stand to reason as there is no restriction written in law, yet I strongly assert that corporation should have responsibility on the stable social development and environmental protection.
The main reason that corporations have a duty to contribute to the environment is that the environment sacrifices a lot during the development of a corporation in different aspects. There is usually a contradiction between the ecology and the interests of corporate executives. For instance, there is one big technological corporation in Taiwan which establish its new factories last year. The new factories were unfortunately built in habitats of a precious frog species. It is definitely unfair for the human being to unlimitedly expand its wealthy without taking care of other living matter on earth. As a result, despite the economic development, the corporation also has responsibility for the protection of the environment.
The second reason is about the people who work for the corporation. Nowadays, people go to work and try their best to finish the projects not only because of the temptation of salaries. Instead, employees care about the success or failure of the corporation emotionally. My father is an employee of an old company which has a history for about fifty years. He once told me that he actually view the company as his second family. The colleagues are like his brothers and sisters. If the corporations only pay attention to their own interests but not the health of the employees, it is immoral for them to benefit from the sacrifices of the employees.
Last but not least, there are tremendous advantages for corporations to ensure the well-being of a society. For example, since the fluctuation of society is one of the fickle factors of management, the stable development of a society can enhance the possibility of a sustainable development of a corporation. On the other hand, a responsible corporation could establish a higher reputation and thus attracts more customers.
In conclusion, though it is straightforward that the corporations always pursue their own interests and try to make as much money as possible, they still have the responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, second, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29342723005 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34485956011 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488262910798 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3389887826 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380536016085 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971978537551 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132888562045 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23155040362 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152550966825 0.0667264976115 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.