Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the art can flourish and be available to all the people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the art.
In this contemporary world, nowadays people like to spend there most of the time on the electronic devices and demising the moral values of the art. But some people of the country believe that the government should funds to art, so that the people of the country would know more about the arts and art is burgeon and available in the heart of all the people in the country. At the same time, other people believe that, if the government will fund then the integrity of the art will threaten.
Firstly, if the government funding of the art, then it is very beneficial for the artist to so their talent and get some more respect from the citizens of the country and the scope in the field of art will also increase day by day. The children who are interested in the art will get the chance to show their talent towards the art. If the art field also gain more profit and get more income as the doctor or engineer then the youth who are interested will make their future in the field of the art. For example, the government should organize the event which are based on the arts and give a prize who wins the event, so that people will also know more about the art of there country and by organizing art events the art can flourish and be available to all the peoples.
On the flip side, other people believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the art. Sometimes it happens that the people who don’t know the art properly is giving the lessons to the people just because the government is funding them and they are gaining a huge profit from it. And once, if people know about this kind of fraud people they will not trust on the people form the next time and think that this all stuff is fake. Due to this kind of people the integrity of the art is threaten. So I think that instead of just gaining money or profit from it and threaten the art, we have to try to spread the importance and moral values of the art to the people so that they know more about the art instead of threating arts.
Finally, I believe that the government have to fund to the art, so that all people of the county will know the importance and the moral values from it and also think to make there future in the art, instead of just giving a fake information of the art just to gain money or threaten the integrity of the art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'threatened'.
Suggestion: threatened
...d of people the integrity of the art is threaten. So I think that instead of just gainin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, then, for example, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30385487528 5.05705443957 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12817559906 2.79657885939 76% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.340136054422 0.4932671777 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5633039356 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.9230769231 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.614492948891 0.243740707755 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.313534098681 0.0831039109588 377% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16535613623 0.0758088955206 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.471121657331 0.150359130593 313% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075719448596 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 12.1639044944 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 100.480337079 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.