Art and culture are pleasure based on satisfaction of making basic survival. People can attain relax after burdensome work and have a makeshift leave from mundane life when they listen to music, appreciate painting or sculpture, or reading novels. Therefore, it is incumbent for government to allot money to ensure that art can prosperous and be accessible to commoners. Although inappropriate investment of government to art may compromise the integrity of the arts, it still has antidote to show advantages of government funding to arts.
As the advent of technology and the prevalent influence of mass media, indigenous culture diminishes and even be extinct but exotic culture are immersive to most commoners’ lives. Government has obligation to preserve indigenous culture and trigger audiences’ attention and preference. In Chinese teenagers’ phone playing 7 rings from the latest album of Ariana Grande-Thank you, next, none of them would like to listen to Beijing opera. Because it is the cultural treasure of China although it is distant to audience and has fluctuant rhythms to difficultly be learned, Chinese government and CCTV should design TV shows or look for some celebrity endorsement to deliver spirit of Beijing opera. As successor of cultural treasure, it needs some artists with artisan to perform Beijing opera.
Government allocation to arts can be reflected in building museums. Museums invested by government can be open to all people for free or several bucks, that invites more commoners to visit there and appreciate art works such as painting, sculpture, and calligraphy. National Museum in China can be visited for free and it is also a base of teenager education. All visitors can enhance patriotism if they watch sculptures of brave soldiers in the Anti-Japan war. Evolution of calligraphy from xingshu to kaishu can be illustrated so that visitors can know profoundness of Chinese traditional culture. They can also be thrilled by exquisiteness of handcrafts after seeing crisp silk skirt worn by princess in Qing Dynasty and delicate ceramic dishware used by the aristocratic emperors hundred years ago.
Some people confirm that government subsidy to art would compromise the integrity of art. The reason behind it is that government would inculcate politicization and beatification of rulers’ image to artists and force them to add bureaucracy and hypocrisy into their art works. Consequently, their works must be bias to praise government rather than marring politicians and governmental officials. In addition, government inclines to fund the certain art they prefer, and then other arts would be neglected and gradually diminished. But this result can be avoided by handing over the power to an institution sponsored by government. Government’s duty is only to provide money to this institution rather than control creation of art works. In that case, government would play an active role to preserve and develop art without restriction. If artists funded by this institution tend to show homosexuality in painting, government should not meddle in it. If they desire to show corruption of bureaucratic politicians in TV series or movies, government should not intervene in fear of being shamed. Another example is Guernica painted by Picasso to prove that government funding to art does not pollute the integrity of art, instead, this paint shows the suffering of people and animals wrenched by violence and chaos created by Nazi Germany after Nazi regime plummeted the bomb into Guernica. Picasso was commissioned by Spanish government to create a large mural for Spanish display at Paris International Exposition. Government commission to Picasso shows anti-war resolution of Spanish government and mourning for innocent people.
Government is the main propagator of art and government endowment can make art popularize among people and become in blossom. Although government funding would pollute the purity and integrity of art, government can hand over the power to an affiliated community without meddling in art development to ensure purity and diversity of art. Then, the advantages of government funding to art outweighs the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 785, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...hware used by the aristocratic emperors hundred years ago. Some people confirm th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ristocratic emperors hundred years ago. Some people confirm that government subs...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment and mourning for innocent people. Government is the main propagator of art...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing to art outweighs the disadvantages.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, may, so, still, then, therefore, as to, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 107.0 58.6224719101 183% => OK
Nominalization: 51.0 12.9106741573 395% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3568.0 2235.4752809 160% => OK
No of words: 661.0 442.535393258 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39788199697 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07049507093 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95904142055 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 340.0 215.323595506 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514372163389 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1123.2 704.065955056 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.445392692 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.933333333 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0333333333 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441733785036 0.243740707755 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131993324512 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962773241806 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26697161459 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116695023354 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 197.0 100.480337079 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.