Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
The writer of issue argues that there are some people who may hold the view that it is necessity for the government to give financial advocacy to the arts and its flourish; however, there are some other people who take the opposite viewpoint and believe that the government adherence threatens the integrity of the art. In what follows, the main reasons posited by both groups are first discussed and then my own position would be delineated.
Those people who argue that the funding is the one of the governments' duties seem to have one chief reason for their position. The reason is the enhancement of the society's artistic knowledge. Unfortunately, the artistic presentations mostly depict in the gallery or the museums to be responsible of the artists' demands. As a matter of a fact, the sole monetary resource of the artists are their artistic presentations; thus, if they want to be affordable of their rudimentary requirements, they have to illustrate or sale their presentation in the high expanse. Besides, in the society where the majority of its population suffer the economic crisis the artistic presentation will be consider as the secondary demand , which they never allocate the sufficient budgets for this requirement. In consequence, if the government covers the main portion of the artists' demands, the presentation will be illustrated in the affordable cost which is accountable to all people's monetary stands, and the society will have an opportunity to get inform about the artistic activities.
As was stated, there are others who believe that the funding threaten the integrity of arts. This people seem to give weight to the artists' freedom. It is lucidly obvious that, in the case, which the government gives the adherence to a specific occupation, the government enforces the responsible of that task to present the feature which aligned with its standards; hence, it is a decent chance to advertise the government's stands and its standards. These artistic presentations are not exceptional from this fact too. According to the noteworthy and intelligence statistic released by the survey conducted in our country, the government of Iran yearly gives the advocacy of 50 million dollars to the paintings which depict its Islamic status and matched with its stands. In any case the government advocates the artistic presentation which presents governmental goals; in this case it can influence and diminish the art's integrity.
I should say that it is the first attitude with which I largely concur. First of all, from my point of view, the reasons on which the first group relies to support their opinion are sensible and plausible. Furthermore, I have one more reason which persuades me to support the first option. The reason is that as the artists less care about the financial problems, they have more chance to flourish and elaborate their presentations. In the case, which they do not acquire the monetary aid from the government, they have to allocate their attentions to the two different tasks in the same time, in which they artistic efficiency will be decline. However, if they have no any worry and concern about the financial incomes, they can illustrate their ultimate efforts, which paves path to the well-extended arts.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that the financial support by the government leads to flourished arts and well-informed society about the artistic presentations.
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In devel 66
- It is important for the government to spend money on art and concert halls than on the recreational facilities such as the swimming pools or playground. 76
- tpo8 73
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 83
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 718, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
...will be consider as the secondary demand , which they never allocate the sufficien...
Line 6, column 94, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
...funding threaten the integrity of arts. This people seem to give weight to the artis...
Line 6, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
... This people seem to give weight to the artists freedom. It is lucidly obvious that, in...
Line 6, column 919, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
... case it can influence and diminish the arts integrity. I should say that it is t...
Line 8, column 668, Rule ID: NOW
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
... will be decline. However, if they have no any worry and concern about the financi...
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'first of all', 'in any case']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231391585761 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.145631067961 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.084142394822 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0226537216828 0.0497285424764 46% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0598705501618 0.0444667217837 135% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100323624595 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0145631067961 0.0406280797675 36% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.92412434589 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0388349514563 0.030933414821 126% => OK
Particles: 0.00161812297735 0.0016655270985 97% => OK
Determiners: 0.147249190939 0.0997080785238 148% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0145631067961 0.0249443105267 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0291262135922 0.0148568991511 196% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3484.0 2732.02544248 128% => OK
No of words: 566.0 452.878318584 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1554770318 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362190812721 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302120141343 0.280924506359 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227915194346 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146643109541 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92412434589 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 219.290929204 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45406360424 0.48968727796 93% => OK
Word variations: 53.9962963382 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 26.9523809524 23.380412469 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.5803214725 59.4972553346 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.904761905 141.124799967 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9523809524 23.380412469 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 57.1643950867 51.4728631049 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.51773049645 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.624284507469 0.391690518653 159% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150728600464 0.123202303941 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0875029982904 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.638861886644 0.547984918172 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.195192340132 0.149214159877 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.288688845458 0.161403998019 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13506289396 0.0892212321368 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.573484325805 0.385218514788 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0823366965337 0.0692045440612 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.482736316173 0.275328986314 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763249830221 0.0653680567796 117% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.