Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The given statement discusses whether or not the government should fund in Arts. I'm of the opinion that the government should invest in Art as it would lead to arts to flourish and the improvement of society as a whole. In the following essay I would try to convince you with my point of view.
There are primarily two ways in which the government can invest in arts. The first way is to make it more profitable for more people to take up arts as a profession. This can be done in multiple ways such as commissioning government funded art projects, exhibitions, various reimbursements etc. Once people see arts as a viable career path it would encourage many budding artists to pursue this path and as a result arts will flourish.
The second way in which the government can invest in arts is providing easy access to art for everyone. This can be done by giving free entries to art museums, advertising various exhibitions and artists, etc. Providing free entries to museums can serve a twofold purpose first it could act as an inspiration for various people and encourage them to pursue arts and secondly it would act as a way for an artist for their work to reach a greater audience. And this is why many famous art museums such as the Louvre in Paris have made entry free for students. Apart from this the government could include various forms of arts in the school curriculum. This would give students an early exposure to arts.
It is necessary that more and more people have access to art because art forces a person to think. Apart from this, art also helps in uniting people and this is the reason why almost all of the movements that have taken place in history had a symbol or an anthem. This is the reason why when art will flourish the society will prosper as well.
The opposing school of thoughts also have a compelling argument, that the government funding might lead to the government trying to spread propaganda through art. Although this has happened time and again in history, various artists were unwilling to compromise their work and as a result the integrity of art has remained intact throughout the generations. And as a result, I believe that the benefits of government funding in arts clearly outweigh its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The given statement discusses whether or not the government should fund in Arts. Im ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...not the government should fund in Arts. Im of the opinion that the government shou...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able career path it would encourage many budding artists to pursue this path and ...
^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries to art museums, advertising various exhibitions and artists, etc. Providing ...
^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eople and this is the reason why almost all of the movements that have taken place in hist...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71212121212 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61759934754 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464646464646 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3170454375 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2105263158 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445093211008 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157217064455 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853707768441 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271924380411 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043462497382 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.