Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
This question raises issue of whether the government should be responsible for funding more arts in the community, making it available to all. Others argue that this source of funding might impact the integrity of such artistic expressions. Indisputably, one can say that when you receive money from a third-party, they would expect your work to go a certain direction. Nevertheless, this is not necessarily true, since a artists can find ingenious way to promote what they really believe in. Thus, I generally disagree with this the fact that this sort of funding would directly impact the arts.
First of all, it is important to highlight that it is not support that has the upper-hand in this type of situation but rather the lack of it. I would like to point out that as an artist myself, it is essential to see governmental initiatives to promote creative forms of expression. To illustrate, we could consider the impact the arts have in children and teenagers who are still finding out about who they truly are. From my own experience, I believe it provides a safe environment where they can experiment with their own abilities and it is crucial that it can done with the necessary support. In this circustamce, I will also highlight that especially if a person is gifted for a certain domain, they will try to find support elsewhere and might end up not getting it and simply giving up. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that instruction and safety are primordal for a human being to develop and improve any craft.
Furthermore, one cannot assert that an artist is not free to express their own point of view because they have receive money from a certain place. Speciffically, in countries where citizens have free speech. Both common sense and experience have told us that whenever there are complicated political situation occuring in a country that is usually when the arts get censored and it wouldn't matter if the money came from private instutions. Hence all the evidence above have demonstrated that the assumption the government will impose something on artists that benefit from state funding is argueable.
Admittedly, the Ministry of Culture will expect that the art being made will have a positive impact on the nation and enrich the minds of its citizens. This is true especially when it comes to National and Historic heritage. In addition, arts and history walk together in a very powerful and interesting way and that has been proved over and over again. However, the above argument does not constitute sufficient support to claim the government will intefere with its citizens' art because the artists could come up with their own sources, for example: tickets, raffles, donations from the private sector. In some cases, an artist would even showcase for free, if they genuinely believe in their work.
In conclusion, although the claim that the state can stirr someone's work in a favourable direction for the government is not meaningless, I believe the its support is far more positive than negative. As long as some measurements are performed, I believe subsidising the arts is absolutely powerful in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ss, this is not necessarily true, since a artists can find ingenious way to promo...
^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a artist' or simply 'artists'?
Suggestion: a artist; artists
...ss, this is not necessarily true, since a artists can find ingenious way to promote what ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 567, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'do' or 'be done'?
Suggestion: do; be done
...abilities and it is crucial that it can done with the necessary support. In this cir...
^^^^
Line 8, column 112, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'received'.
Suggestion: received
...eir own point of view because they have receive money from a certain place. Speciffical...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ually when the arts get censored and it wouldnt matter if the money came from private i...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 441, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...the money came from private instutions. Hence all the evidence above have demonstrate...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 149, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...overnment is not meaningless, I believe the its support is far more positive than negat...
^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... absolutely powerful in the long run.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, third, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, sort of, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3031.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 604.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01821192053 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95746018188 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73324815487 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476821192053 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 939.6 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.644900714 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.576923077 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369553264413 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111509212104 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172209851683 0.0758088955206 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235079341045 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.257276091006 0.0667264976115 386% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.