Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The arts in all theirs aspects are very important to the society, however to be an artist is tought, precisely in which concerns economic issues that people who live with arts pass during their careers. In those lines, the government funding of the arts is highly necessary in order to flourish the artistic vein.
Currently, an artistic life could be very challenging. In general, the society don’t give the expected value for arts how they give for other professions like engineers or medics, and this condition is the main reason for very talented people give up for theirs artistic careers.
Furthermore, the few artists which we have nowadays need to put very high prices in theirs concerts or galleries in order to try to gain some money back, also giving an unwanted status of a “high society stuff” for people that like and go to this type of place.
Under those circumstances, a funding, better if it’s from the government, but could also be from private institutions, will be essential for maintaining and flourishing the arts in general. It’s a profession that is actually in danger of existence and the general public doesn’t have the proper access to them.
On the other hand, this type of funding ought to be without politic interests. The government might discern that this type of help cannot mean that they are the owner or the bosses of the artists. Under those circumstances, this financial aid could really threat the integrity of the arts.
Another important point is that the funding could also not be selective, in other words, the government might support all type of arts and not just the types that they most like or that is the called “left“ or “right”. This type of action could be worse and more dangerous than the previously discussed, because selecting what the public will be able to see is a very serious act of manipulation and the art cannot became this type of politic manoeuver.
In summary, the government funding is actually very important and also necessary to ensure that arts can flourish during actual times. Also, this help cannot be a way for creating a social or politic selection, the aid must be to bring arts for all type of people, without discerning the political preference or social class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
... the few artists which we have nowadays need to put very high prices in theirs conce...
^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...back, also giving an unwanted status of a 'high society stuff' for peop...
^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...actually in danger of existence and the general public doesn't have the proper access to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, really, so, in general, in summary, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97142857143 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7810238113 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488311688312 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9508552342 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.714285714 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266348876377 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109779498553 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848969488404 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143091361665 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901354748096 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.