The author recommends that citizens of developed nations must reduce their consumption of energy and must encourge more frugal usage of energy sources before the global climate change becomes more profound. I completely agree with the authors point of view, and put forth the following points to bolster my view. The global warming has been increasing year on year. The damage to caused to flora and fauna is almost irrepairable, due to large scale deforestation to fulfill our growing needs for energy consumption. Increase in sea levels is already effecting coastal regions drastically. If no action is taken as a collective effort now, it may be too late to recuperate from the damage we have caused to the global climate.
First of all, global warming isn't a theory anymore, that doesn't have any statistical proof. As the consumption of fossil fuels(petrol, diesel etc) increases to sustain our ever increasing need for energy source. The outcome of burning fossil fuels causes emission of greehouse gases. These gases trap the incoming heat from the sun and other planetory sources and doesn't let it escape the earth atmosphere. Due to this, temperature of earth seems to increase by a fraction of a degree celcius every year. Though this might seem to be a minute change in the large scheme of things, the effects can be quite devastating. The change in temperature impacts directly the weather patterns on a global scale. That means, the summers are too humid, and the winters are too wet. This kind of erratic behaviour has a negative impact on the agriculture. The plants cannot adapt so quickly to the changing weather conditions and hence there are huge losses in the food industry. Change in weahter patterns also effect humans. Our immunity takes a direct hit as the weather change so erratically.
Secondly, large scale deforestation takes place to continue providing us infrastructure and building materials for our energy producing industry. The green belt in Tamilnadu, as state in India was cleared and reduced to 80% of its former region to provide resources and land area to the nuclear power supply plant. This effected the regions rainfall and caused mass flooding in the cities adjacent to the green belt. The loss was so humungous that the state government is still reeling from it. The loss in capital from the nuclear power plan clearly outweighed the gain from the new plant. The loss we cause to the flora, also effects the fauna of the region. Many exquisite birds and animals are the verge of extinction, due the large scale deforestation.
Finally, increasing sea levels are no myth as depicted in hollywood movie Waterworld, if we don't take preventive measures we might soon be facing a shortage of land mass. Year on year, the population is increasing. And so is our consumption of our energy. Most of the energy supplied around the world is from burning fossil fuels, and non-renewable resources. As stated earlier, the global warming and greenhouse gases are increasing the global temperature slowly but steadily. A direct impact of this is the increase in sea levels. Many small islands in Iceland are totally submerged under water now and hence not dwellable. This kind of migration of a whole society is a loss of a complete culture. The art forms and culture from the specific land region is lost forever. The monuments submerged in water.
To conclude, all the mentioned effects are a direct impact of increasing energy consumption and need of individuals in developed nations. So the onus is on them to work towards a general cause to save the planet earth before the effect becomes irrepairable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...limate. First of all, global warming isnt a theory anymore, that doesnt have any ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...bal warming isnt a theory anymore, that doesnt have any statistical proof. As the cons...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the sun and other planetory sources and doesnt let it escape the earth atmosphere. Due...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
...r power supply plant. This effected the regions rainfall and caused mass flooding in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 592, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...outweighed the gain from the new plant. The loss we cause to the flora, also effect...
^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ed in hollywood movie Waterworld, if we dont take preventive measures we might soon ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'kind of', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290854572714 0.240241500013 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.142428785607 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0914542728636 0.0880659088768 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0539730134933 0.0497285424764 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0284857571214 0.0444667217837 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107946026987 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0434782608696 0.0406280797675 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70099243072 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0314842578711 0.030933414821 102% => OK
Particles: 0.00149925037481 0.0016655270985 90% => OK
Determiners: 0.122938530735 0.0997080785238 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0104947526237 0.0249443105267 42% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0148568991511 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3650.0 2732.02544248 134% => OK
No of words: 608.0 452.878318584 134% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00328947368 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391447368421 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261513157895 0.280924506359 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169407894737 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115131578947 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70099243072 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 313.0 219.290929204 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514802631579 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 65.0381305262 55.4138127331 117% => OK
How many sentences: 37.0 20.6194690265 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.4324324324 23.380412469 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0272516277 59.4972553346 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6486486486 141.124799967 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4324324324 23.380412469 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.378378378378 0.674092028746 56% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 42.5837482219 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.96666666667 1.64882698954 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262022290242 0.391690518653 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0754408297169 0.123202303941 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0601595731598 0.077325440228 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.443630838276 0.547984918172 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14525142524 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915262035844 0.161403998019 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465304740016 0.0892212321368 52% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.491059271837 0.385218514788 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0767045884032 0.0692045440612 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202838716431 0.275328986314 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410685309616 0.0653680567796 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.4325221239 163% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.