Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Political leaders are the ones who get the chance to run the nation after being elected and then forming the government. To become a good politician one needs to be dynamic, honest, sagacious, calm and composed. According to the prompt, one group believes that it is necessary for political leaders to withhold information from the public. On the other hand, others have the view that the public has the right to every information. This essay intends to discuss both the views and delve into the pros and cons of both sides.
To begin with, to become a successful political leader, one needs the confidence of his party members. If the politician continues to give out certain secret matters out to the public, he is bound to face problems within his own party. There are a lot of sensitive information which if leaked to the public might bring a lot of repercussions. For instance, Bangladesh was supposed to get the Corona vaccine produced in China. But the deal made between the two countries had the condition that Bangladesh must not reveal the cost price of the vaccines. What happened was one of the political leaders, gave this information to the media. The result was that China then disagreed to supply any vaccine to Bangladesh. So, this information needed to be kept from the public for their own good.
Again, the public does have the right to know what goes on in the country. Due to lack of transparency from the politicians, they get a lot of chance for corruption and without a doubt a lot of countries are facing this situation. The leaders are filling their pockets with black money and keeping it in the Swiss Bank and are buying properties abroad where they do not face any troubles doing so. As a result, the countries are loosing a lot of money. For instance, it was found that one of the political leaders of Bangladesh was involved with the casino business which is illegal over there. By this business he built a huge empire and laundered huge amount of money abroad.
In conclusion, whether the political leaders will provide a specific piece of information to the public needs to be considered carefully. Sensitive information which might cause harm to the country needs to be kept hidden and other information which will propel the country forward needs to be publicized heavily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... members. If the politician continues to give out certain secret matters out to t...
^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...re a lot of sensitive information which if leaked to the public might bring a lot ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79448621554 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62081100474 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503759398496 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7112703955 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0952380952 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305992541733 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902256540285 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943868809878 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201358459705 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766278183529 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.