Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed
Since the dawn of humanity fluidity of data is the most controversial issue since it has different outcomes. When the point is going under consideration for the info regarding politics, some peoples wish to know every bit while others vehemently oppose it. I, for one, advocates for the former one. Two consecutive reasons are illustrated upon under to make it plausible.
The first justification for information ought to be informed at a whole to the folks is, creating awareness among the public. Mystical future will seem to be more opaque if ones do not know about one's current status. The scenario of the Japanese folks after the second world war is the suitable example of this. That time the people were suffering numerous problems namely: scarcity of food, health issue, broken economic condition are just a few to their name. Considering the fact from inner, it was required to take a sole decision to overcome the problems. From that realization, working as much by getting at least minimal was the most revolutionary decision for them at that time and after a few decades, their position in the global economy states that they were right. In contrast to that, if they were not informed about the status they were holding that time, then it would become impossible to make their unprecedented work possible.
On top of that, to justify the decision of the people of their own, it is badly required. Experience from my own is going to establish this reason. When I was in college, there was holding an election to choose the captain of a debate team from our class and decision lied on the five of us chosen by the penmaker of the class. The decision was very crucial and sophisticated and we were so excited. After basis on several traits, the person elected as a leader by us just briefed some difficulties of him. By comparing with others, we got our findings that whatever the situation will be rather we have to help himself to come out the problems or to drop the competition. So, from that, we learned that it is always likely to take a wrong decision whatever the precautions we accept or not. But the possible solution might be found only if we get notified the details of our selection.
Due to the aforementioned ground, we can conclude that all are not that lucky to get success in every step but can ensure their next if they are informed at the proper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dented work possible. On top of that, to justify the decision of the people of...
^^
Line 8, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on. Due to the aforementioned ground, we can come to a conclusion that all are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, while, at least, in contrast, in contrast to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69358669834 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61262793458 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558194774347 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1414166814 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.05 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160869456265 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431135819639 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499575609693 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836590536391 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344659665332 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.