Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c

Essay topics:

Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

In all the nation’s political personality plays a pivotal role in enhancement and development of that nation. In order to make an effective system in the nation, it is crucial to choose such a political leader that can address the problem of its people. For that, the political person must understand the problems and must find an effective solution in order to favor the belief of people. The prompts above suggest two natures of political person and wants us to support one of them. In my opinion, in order to be an effective, political leaders must yield to opinion of the public and abandon some reckless principles for the shake of compromise.

To begin, in many countries, the people are given an opportunity to choose their political leaders by believing that if they win the election of choosing the political leaders, the political leader will address their problems in favor of them and support them in each and every conduct. For instance, in any country, before the election, the political leader who is the candidate in election is lobbying the public by giving the belief of solving the people and country problem by writing their activities in their manifesto. The political leader is trying to compromise with the nation's people. They try to be an effective political leader, if he wins the election foe choosing the better political leaders. This scenario suggests that many people in the country wants their political leader to be effective and for that the leader must yield to the public and abandon principal in order to compromise.

Political leaders are coming in the field only after understanding the public. They may wait for several years in order to know the problem faced by the public. For this, they must yield to the public opinion. For example, if one is coming in the field of politics without knowing the public, then he will not be effective in the view of people. If leaders are pliant only on their principle and neglect the opinion of the public, then they will not make their root for longer time in the field of politics. If he is adhering only to his principles and do not advocate the needs of people, then he will be insular and he becomes an ineffective leader in the view of the public. This case also suggests that in order to be an effective political leader, he must relinquish his principal and must be dispassionate about the public opinion.

Both of the above scenario supports the position of being an effective political leader must abandon the principles. However, in the case of the situation when dispassionate towards the people opinion may cause harm to the nations, it is correct to remain consistent about committing to the particular principals and objectives. But in most cases, the pollical leader will be an effective leader, if he abandons the principle for the shake of compromise and yields to the public opinion.

Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in most cases, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87221095335 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.642672763 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.379310344828 0.4932671777 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6163822189 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.1 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.65 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508530474437 0.243740707755 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191260096185 0.0831039109588 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116693053214 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357426792098 0.150359130593 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544109336255 0.0667264976115 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.