Wilderness is part of nature as much as humans. They are part of a chain that determines the existence of every species. Removing one or more creature disrupts this cycle. Though the effects would not be clear in the very next moment, the consequences build with each passing second to hit the human generation. Consider a forest where the population of both tigers and deer's live. Both these populations are directly proportional to each other. If the population of deer's reduce than the tigers die out with no food. If the population of tigers reduce, the deer's die out with over grazing. This over grazing consequently brings the soil erosion which ends the insect life in that area. The extinction of one population destroyed the others too. Though technological advancements are pushing these consequences away at present, it is still good to be wary of the future. And yet sacrificing the funds despite the present economic and social problems for an effect that is yet to come is not sensible either.
Nations across the world are going to great lengths to ensure the survival of their wilderness. Many policies and reforms are introduced. This issue was even recognized globally and a uniform set of rules for preservation is made too. Donations and funds are encouraged through out the world and many social groups are created to spread awareness about the necessity of preserving the wildlife in their natural state. Many countries have opened up these wild life sanctuaries as tourist spots to propagate the need for such pristine protection of animals.
Yet it is not denied that nations never care about their wilderness unless it climbs the list of endangered species or at the verge of extinction. The pollution kills thousands of birds and sea creatures everyday and yet the government doesn't acknowledge these misfortunes. Because these creatures does not lie in the regional borders of the national authority and hence they cannot be held responsible for their state. And yet when a species that exists in these national borders when listed as an endangered species, they go to unnecessary lengths to ensure their protection. This hypocrisy becomes very evident when a nation declares policies to prevent their endangered animals from going extinct by providing them with sources whose manufacturing wastes are dumped in the ocean, killing millions and endangering even more sea animals.
Most nations spend unfathomable amounts on construction of sanctuaries and wildlife parks for these creatures rather than investing in a nostrum that would put a stop from other creatures from going extinct or endangered. This amounts could have aided in ending many social problems in their nations and bolstered their economy. Consider India where there are more than ten wildlife sanctuaries. It spends more on maintaining these wildlife sanctuaries than on ending unemployment in the country which could have been scotched if the same amount of funds were available.
With the growing population, the need for space and more resources is growing. This notion of preserving land that could have ended homelessness in a small nation and could have provided a short term relief to big nations, for wilderness is baffling. Many protests might raise with this notion and an unrest might begin where people question the priorities of the government. This extra land could provide many individuals a spacious home they dream of. This does not imply that the wilderness should be driven away , but suggests a relocation to safer grounds where they cannot interfere with the humans and vice versa.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re directly proportional to each other. If the population of deers reduce than the...
^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...too. Donations and funds are encouraged through out the world and many social groups are cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ls thousands of birds and sea creatures everyday and yet the government doesnt acknowled...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...eatures everyday and yet the government doesnt acknowledge these misfortunes. Because ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat the wilderness should be driven away , but suggests a relocation to safer grou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, second, so, still, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3017.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 586.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14846416382 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70549671084 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51023890785 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 926.1 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7171392831 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3225806452 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9032258065 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.74193548387 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19829809162 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464794511811 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336043862265 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102368897858 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129783753092 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.