Some people think that ideal parents are strict disciplinarians who keep their children on the straight and narrow path with firm yet loving control. Other argue that ideal parents from loving bonds with their children through a relationship closer to friendship and a less authoritarian approach.
Parents love their children and are always concerned about their child’s future. They always desire their children to be well behaved and disciplined in their life. The author here asserts that some people think that ideal parents are strict disciplinarians who keep their children in straight and narrow paths with firm yet loving control while other argue that parents form loving bonds with their children through a closer to friendship and a less authoritarian approach. However, in my view I believe that an ideal parents are those who form a close bond with their children but, on the contrary also are strict disciplinarians who keep their children on a straight and narrow path.
When a child is at an infant stage, parents form close bonds and love their children blindly. Parents feel that their children are their stars and hope that they will make them proud some day in their life. Parents also prioritize the nurturing of their children at infancy above everything. At beginning of their children’s growth they always wish to impart their children with fundamental ideas, beliefs, values, culture and traditions along with a proper behavior. They do not risk their children’s growth by teaching or imparting them with any wrong ideas and approach.
Further when a child grows up and starts studying in a playschool till high school, method of parenting takes a bit different approach. At this point of time, parents feel that their children have to be treated with more of a disciplinarian approach. While studying in school, children have a greater possibility of being easily influenced by the peer, friends, relatives etc. So, an ideal parent understands the significance of a more disciplinarian approach for effective parenting. At this stage of parenting life, an ideal parent has to incline equally towards a disciplinarian approach and also, towards forming a loving and cherishing bonds with their children.
Further, when their children grow up and enter into their teenage, they study in any college or university. At this stage a child grows up significantly and somehow feels to make decision pertaining to their own lives. Also, in some cases they do not feel necessary to consult their own parents before making such a decision. For example, a child enrolled at a university falls in love with a girl studying at the same university and decides to marry the same girl without consulting their parents. Such huge decisions pertaining to both the lives of the boy and the girl can pose a serious threats to both their lives at an early stage. So, at this stage an ideal parent has to incline more towards a disciplinarian approach of parenting and get more stringent with their children. But, also at the same time they should maintain a loving bond with their children. Otherwise, that will lead to undesirable consequences.
In sum, I view that an ideal parent has to keep a disciplinarian approach and also, at the same time form loving bonds with their children. Both of these approaches should be balanced according to the stages of their children’s growth. Also, it varies from one child to another according to their behavioral characteristics and it’s the parents who can at the best know their children’s traits and behavior.<br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 592, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'threat'?
Suggestion: threat
...the boy and the girl can pose a serious threats to both their lives at an early stage. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, as to, for example, in my view, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2767.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1146025878 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87448097849 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428835489834 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 812.7 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4165775304 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.68 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.64 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.12 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.536006722935 0.243740707755 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192619930542 0.0831039109588 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158515434169 0.0758088955206 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.375247385349 0.150359130593 250% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168427559438 0.0667264976115 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.