Student performance should be the basis of salary for teachers
The youth are the future upon which the nation will progress. They should be nurtured and educated so that they become assets to the nation in the future. This is the reason why most of the countries in the world take education seriously and in many countries, right to education is a fundamental right. The school is often referred as the second home which makes teachers our second parents. Salary in education has been a controversial issue in most of the countries. For the magnitude of their job, they are often paid less. Student performance is one of the parameters by which we can judge a teacher, however, that should not be the sole basis of their pay. Nonetheless, I believe that the teachers who constantly strive for good education must be sufficiently rewarded, monetarily or otherwise.
The performance of a student depends on the teacher and student alike. It is a collective effort by both. A diligent teacher cannot spend all her time on insolent, uncooperative students. She would rather teach the students who have the will and motivation to study. The teacher can try to motivate and inspire kids but some kids are way too obstinate. These kids often bring down their class average and make the teacher look bad. In my opinion, students are at 100% fault in this case. It would be extremely unfair to pay less salary to teachers just because some students failed to perform well.
Paying teachers by the academic performance of students can have many detrimental effects. If such a policy is passed, some teachers will likely use unfair means to increase students’ performance. For instance, a teacher can discuss the test questions in class so that his students do well in the upcoming test and in turn secure a high salary for himself. This is fundamentally wrong and deleterious to the process of gaining quality education. In the long term, students will not be able to do well in their higher studies as a result of their shaky fundamentals. As mentioned in the earlier, youth are the future of the nation and such policies can even jeopardize the future of the nation.
However, some might argue that teachers will be encouraged to teach well if they are paid higher salaries. The counter argument to that is, if the students don't perform well even after industrious efforts of the teacher, the teacher who receives low salary will be demotivated further and that will be eventually be counterproductive to the students. The teachers who teach well need to be rewarded from time to time, I do not disagree with that. However, student performance should not be the basis of their basic salary for the reasons stated above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
The youth are the future upon which the nation will p...
^^^
Line 13, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er argument to that is, if the students dont perform well even after industrious eff...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nonetheless, second, so, well, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88546255507 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72662759644 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484581497797 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8255960145 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3076923077 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65384615385 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509016775605 0.243740707755 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133847034664 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136441942391 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332840576304 0.150359130593 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814803921754 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.