Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Recently, a prevalent statement we often see is that students ought to accept knowledge passively. This is because catching up with questions too much would waste others time. Opponents, nonetheless, argue that questioning what students were taught is necessary. Only questioning could bring better comprehension. From a personal view, both are reasonable. The details would be discussed below.
To begin with, students are essential to avoid nonsense questions for saving others time. Specifically, catching up with nonsense questions not only waste the time of his own but also teacher's. In this case, it is significant to think thoroughly before asking. At the same time, not questioning too much in class time is also crucial. Class time is limited. Less time would be left if everyone asks their own questions. Worse than, the environment of teaching would be ruined. Teachers would have a hard time for unable to finish class. Hence, always questioning is not a fair method while learning.
Despite questioning too often have such harmful influence, accepting knowledge passively all the time seems more foolish. There is no doubt that teachers take an essential place in our studying. They could enhance studying efficiency significantly by not only teaching in class but also answering questions. Depending on a study from the University of Tokyo, students are divided into two groups to learn a specific book, one with a teacher but another not. About 89-percent of students in group one work better when facing a same task. In this case, the teacher provides the ability to learn more readily and correct the misconstrue. Hence, taking effort on solving easy questions by oneself and asking for help when facing real difficulties is an intelligent manner.
Admittedly, a minority of individuals tend to believe that solving questions by one's own also could induce misconstrue but hard to correct. Nevertheless if we could analyze this issue from a different view, we could find they have oversimplified the fact that learning by oneself is hard to avoid. At the same time, it is also the way to cultivate learning ability. There would not always be teachers sitting in our side. In this condition, trying to solve easy problems on one's own is a well beginning to improve learning ability.
To sum up, questioning too often or accepting knowledge passively all the time is both harmful. Therefore, one should try to work on his own at the beginning of meeting question. And never detest to ask teachers for help while getting in real troubles. Only in this way could learn be successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 619, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ility to learn more readily and correct the misconstrue. Hence, taking effort on solving easy q...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...induce misconstrue but hard to correct. Nevertheless if we could analyze this issue from a d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 283, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to be'
Suggestion: to be
... troubles. Only in this way could learn be successful.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14319248826 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79242199927 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504694835681 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9207733095 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.6774193548 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.7419354839 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.58064516129 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12003737426 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345068437794 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033812844235 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795057704124 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403553917317 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.