Teaching as a practice involving the interaction between teachers and students are more or else a connective phase which serves as a bond between the two parties. In a setting where basic understanding of the various subjects being taught are comprehensively passed on to the active listeners, it is expedient that this integrative knowledge should initiate an excellent level of reasoning and critical thinking.
However, in higher institutions where students are given take home research work seminars to write up a logical approach to proffering a solution that can justify the points provided, this has further made student to delve further in that field so that they can tackle questions asked.
Growing up in an African home with a mother always checking up on her children's academic journey, this has gotten her to logically initiate conversations resulting to constant formulation of different ideas and perceptions to be expressed as questions.
Thus, had it been what we were taught by our teachers were always right we would not be marked down by other board of teaching institutions. Many people do not rely on hundred percent of accepting passively of what are being taught by their teachers, but they individually create study time to propose ideas that relate to answers brought before them.
Evidently, No one is perfect and as human beings we are bound to make mistakes, so the logic behind this assumption sets a contradiction on the basis of passive acceptance. For instance, a difficult question relating to biological science was asked by a student, above all, the lecturer turned that question as an assignment to be taken home allocating marks to people that proposes an advanced and better solution to it. This is an unfair scenario as it is posing as fear of belittlement of the lecturer to limit their potentials.
This questions the fact that most times a teacher who is deeply rooted in his or her field is a scholar, but at the same time inability to assimilate the questions can confuse students resulting into further questioning of the lecturer's potent ability and capability.
In conclusion, from my point of view I relay my support to students' ability to back up their knowledge through the use of technology rather than solely depending further on teachers' words,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...depending further on teachers words,
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12928759894 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89756858012 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593667546174 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6598799792 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.727272727 118.986275619 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4545454545 23.4991977007 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135891331831 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04751559893 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270316409875 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596000940119 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277144262939 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.