Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question
what they are taught instead of accepting it passively
Questioning is the reflection of curiosity. It is therefore every students should keep on doubting the things what they are taught until they get the clear concept of it which is important not only to have a lucid idea of whatever they are taught but also to develop the creativity and imagination. When students have an habit of doubting: they can create new way of dealing on the same matter (imagination), they develop a habit of meticulous reading and it is ultimately important to develop their personality.
First, if Galileo, an Italian astronomer of seventeenth century, passively accepted the idea put forth by church that, earth is the center of the whole universe (a geocentric approach) he would not be successful to enunciate his heliocentric approach, which suggests that it is not sun but earth which rotates around the sun. His skepticism on the widely believed and even taught idea led him to a development of well known scientific theory upon which all the astronomical calculations are based till now. This example is sufficient to justify that skepticism lead to the development of new idea leading a new discovery.
Second, as said by a Noble laureate Dan Sechmen, Chemistry 2016, he discovered the idea of quasi crystal, which was against the well believed idea about the formation of crystals, was the result of consistent determination and the skepticism on the well believed idea of general crystals. According to generally believed idea, crystals must be regular and periodic( atoms arranged in a periodic pattern) but his discovery led the new type of crystals which are regular but not essentially periodic. This is one best example proving that his skepticism on generally believed idea about crystals how led him upto the Noble prize.
Accepting everything passively what are taught may lead a serious problem of laziness among the students which have been observed in the past few years of the scenario of higher level school students. Students are provided with all notes in the classroom which they passively accept and even do not follow the text books and references. These students are found to give much poor performances in the entrance examination and other aptitude tests. It further bolsters the notion supporting skepticism.
As a concluding remark, skepticism has led more achievements in the fields of natural sciences. So, students should bring skepticism on the study is justifiable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e things what they are taught until they get the clear concept of it which is imp...
^^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ity and imagination. When students have an habit of doubting: they can create new ...
^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le laureate Dan Sechmen, Chemistry 2016, he discovered the idea of quasi crystal,...
^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s led more achievements in the fields of natural sciences. So, students should br...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13131313131 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85999536939 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537878787879 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1327185222 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.466666667 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253185846086 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835047904262 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103220655747 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147396370201 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105431630833 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.