The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Why should people question on authority? Or what kind of people question on authority? Are important things to analyze while dealing the issue. The questioning behavior of people on the authority reflects how people are careful and concerned and leads the authority to be more careful on their duty too. The well being of people on the society is determined by large number of factors most of which comes jointly with the authority. The idea presented in the topic is justifiable because: authority is one which has complete power to lead the society, it is an organization motivated for the welfare of society. Also, questioning lead the transparency of authority.
First, authority, an organization made by people of society by electing the members from them, has complete authoritative power to lead the society. The rules and regulations and also the plans developed by them are crucial for the well being and welfare of society. If people question on the authority about their service and way of working, they will be more careful and more concerned on the work. It leads the proper use of the power as well as budgets on the development of the society.
Examples of countries like, Nepal, Pakistan etc. show the poverty rate not decreasing satisfactorily in the gap of past ten years is the direct consequences of lack of good governance and lack of questioning on authority. Government was found to be too monotonous and autocratic. The result is higher rate of poverty, increasing in number of employee going out of country for job and decreasing per capita income of people. It indeed, resulted on conflicts within the family members instead of the well being. In democratic countries, people elects their representative among themselves. They should be motivated for the well development and welfare of society and can answer the questions related to society.
The press freedom is one of the inherent part of democracy in which people are free to express their views in media and can easily go on opposition if they do not like the governance of government. In Nepal after the promulgation of new constituent around 10 years ago, the press freedom was established. After that, media mainly allowed political leaders to face with the problems of society by organizing a kind of “questioning” program on which they must answer the questions asked by public. It not only led the development of responsibility to the leader but also helps to make transparency on governance.
Finally it can be inferred that questioning makes public to ask about the governance of leaders. It makes the regulations transparent and finally leads to the well being of public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...which comes jointly with the authority. The idea presented in the topic is justifia...
^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ten years is the direct consequences of lack of good governance and lack of ques...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: increasing
.... The result is higher rate of poverty, increasing in number of employee going out of country for jo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mployee going out of country for job and decreasing per capita income of people. ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...s to make transparency on governance. Finally it can be inferred that questioning mak...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04514672686 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00701773005 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469525959368 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0005787002 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4583333333 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79166666667 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291263006534 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900355808146 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736953124255 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171770775513 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710281496855 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.