The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes.
The way we see something is an important aspect of perception of that thing. Everyone sees the same world every time, but the the way we interpret things vary from person to person depending on their experiences and knowledge.
A child sees the world without any prior knowledge about it. He solely depends on his view of the world, nothing else. But when the child grows up and learns about different knowledge achieved by human over the course of time, he perceives the world differently. He sees the same world that he used to see when he was a child, but in a different way. He interprets his views in a different way.
For instance, humans gazed towards the sky from the very beginning. They saw the stars, planets and many other astronomical objects without even knowing what they actually were. But over time, humans learned to study the stars and planets, their motions etc. And now we know that the stars are like our sun, with varying properties and many other things we didn’t know before. Now, we see the same sky with the same objects in it like the ancient humans used to see, but with a different perspective. This suggests that the world is the same as before, but we have learned to look at it in a different way.
Another intriguing example is the development of quantum mechanics. Isaac Newton said that light is a particle. But scientists rejected that theory and adopted the wave theory of light, which were compatible with experiments and phenomenons. But in 1900, Max Planck revived the particle theory of light in his quantum theory. Although at first opposed by the scientists, later the quantum theory of light was adopted by most scientists and was compatible with experiments. Now the quantum theory is vastly used in modern electronics, which suggests that light is the same as it were before, but the way we theorized it changed our perceptios about it.
There is natural phenomenon like thunder, which the ancient people feared so much. They thought of it as the expression of rage of God. But now we know exactly how thunder occurs, which changes our views about it.
Therefore, the world is the same as it were before, but it is our knowledge that makes us to see it in a different way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...one sees the same world every time, but the the way we interpret things vary from perso...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...one sees the same world every time, but the the way we interpret things vary from perso...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he used to see when he was a child, but in a different way. He interprets his views in a different...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... different way. He interprets his views in a different way. For instance, humans gazed toward...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 593, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...fore, but we have learned to look at it in a different way. Another intriguing example is the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d it changed our perceptios about it. There is natural phenomenon like thunder...
^^^^
Line 21, column 101, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s our knowledge that makes us to see it in a different way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74744897959 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52919232712 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454081632653 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.727989049 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9130434783 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0434782609 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5652173913 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.83258426966 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343073205767 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956825796461 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927968992497 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180120438802 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956990832641 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.