This topic raises the controversial issue of evaluating greatness of a nation on basis of two vital factors which drive this greatness. In the above argument, the author wrongly considers that greatness is not a function of both well-being and achievements of its prominent people. I reckon that any nation which is good in both the factor could be taken as a great nation - although one of the factor may weigh more than the other. Indisputably, as author mentioned well-being of the people is most important and an indicator of greatness of a nation. Thus, I personally disagree with the author's faulty assumption that both factors are independent but would argue that both are prerequisites in evaluation.
First of all, I would like to point out that any autocratic nation could become great by their global achievements. To illustrate this let us consider the example of China. One of most prolific nations in field of AI, with its tyranny against Muslim community emerging as a great nation in the global view without concerning much about the well-being of the people. Similar countries like this are North Korea.
Similarly, a nations greatness could be an indicator of both well-being of people and its technological achievements. For example,we all know that United States is the most technological country. Nonetheless, the state implements proper measures in pursuing the well-being of the people with or without the use of this technology. In this circumstance it is obvious that any nation with similar factors would achieve greatness.
Admittedly, well-being of the people plays a major role than the achievements of individual personalities in that country.
Countries such as Sweden substantially has lower mortality rates and death rates than any other country in the world. In fact, Sweden has not got a single renowned artist or scientist in this contemporary world but it can be considered as a great nation solely on the basis of its concern and well-being of the people.
In conclusion, although well-being is a key indicator of greatness of a nation, it does not out weigh technological achievements in determining a nation's greatness. Finally, this very factor can also make a nation great and it also depends on a global view of all these factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...e this are North Korea. Similarly, a nations greatness could be an indicator of both...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
... technological achievements. For example,we all know that United States is the most...
^^^
Line 10, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nological achievements in determining a nations greatness. Finally, this very factor ca...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, nonetheless, similarly, so, thus, well, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12868632708 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03073775324 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469168900804 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8782483487 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.277777778 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287937732849 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100731448221 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708302091498 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159718013605 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048596477341 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.