The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
We try to guage the development of a nation based on various factors like - literacy rate, access to basic healthcare facilites, general well being of its people, success of its rulers, artists or scientists, etc. The prompt suggests that the greatness of a nation can be appriased by the general well-being of all its people not just based on the prosperity of its rulers, artists or scientists. I agree with the prompt and feel that it is the lives of all the people of a nation that gives a true picture of the nation for the following reasons.
Firstly, given a nation, the number of its rulers, artists or scientists is picayune as comapered to the whole population of a nation. Hence, this pittance group of successful people are not a represntative of the whole nation. It is highly likely that the afore mentioned group of people, due to their means, popularity and adeptness, are able to lead a luxuriant life without having to think about their livelihood. However, this may not be the case with its general population. In stark contrast, the commonman would have to do arduous tasks everyday to earn their bread and butter, to send their children to school so that they can have better future, or have to walk miles to have basic amenities with healthecare or drinking water. And to underscore, a nation is primarily composed of general population and not just its leaders, artistis or scientists. Therefore, It the conditions of the general population that determines the development of any nation.
Secondly, the rulers, artistis and scientists of a nation are able to do what they do partly due to the previlages they are born with. A person is able to become a ruler may be because he/she was born into a family that is associated with politics for generations. A person is able to become an artist may be because he/she is born into a family that is providential and his parents do not have to think about how to survive but rather think about how can they make best out of their lives. Similary, a person is able to become a scientist for his/her parents have the financial ability to support him/her for a long academic training. However, this is not the case with rest of the people in a nation. There will be myraid of poeple who live below poverty line, performing hard and mundane works to make their living everyday. Thus, it is fatuous to consider a nation successful based on the achievements of its rulers, artists or its scientists as they might have been lucky to be in a position where they are and need not necessarily be to the encouragemnet by the government.
However, there might be an exception, which, in the realms of our discussion, cannot be ignored. If a country is able to produce successful leaders, artists or scientists in considerable numbers consistently, one can consider that nation to be successful.
Thus, it is imperative to determine the development of a nation based on the general well being it people as they form the majority of the nation and they might not be as lucky as its rulers, artists or scientists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 546, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ommonman would have to do arduous tasks everyday to earn their bread and butter, to send...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 819, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... and mundane works to make their living everyday. Thus, it is fatuous to consider a nati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 100, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
...tion based on the general well being it people as they form the majority of the nation...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2550.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75746268657 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76407182888 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417910447761 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.0 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4087537533 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305232809622 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110522088331 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768540328153 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200508813772 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650980609103 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.