R. robustus
The lecturer talks about various aspects of R. robustus that imply that it actively ran and hunted its prey which is in stark contrast to what the passage suggests.
Firstly, it is generally the case that the animals that hunted other animals are roughly twice the mass of their prey. Taking this observation into consideration, R. robustus was approximately twice the mass of baby psittacosaur dinosaur and the lecturer decisively concludes that R. robustus in fact hunted baby psittacosaur dinosaur and other similar sized animals. This assertion by the lecturer rebuts the passage which claim that R. robustus could not have hunted the dinosaur due to its small size.
Secondly, an animal named Tasmania Devil has similar leg position when compared to that of R. robustus. And Tasmania Devil can reach speeds up to 50 KMPH. Given that Tasmania Devil can run at such speed, it can be safely inferred that R. robustus also ran at similar speeds enabling it to chase fast moving prey. This is in contradiction to the passage that implies that the leg position of R. robustus would not enable them to run at high speed.
Finally, the passage points out that there are no teeth marks on the dinosaur bones found in the R. robustus fossil which indicates that R. robustus fed on the eggs of the dinosaur while scavenging. However, it is said in the lecture, that R. robustus, in spite of having strong jaw bones, did not chew its prey. Instead, R. robustus swallowed its prey in large pieces which explains the absence of teeth marks on the fossil bones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84644194757 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47873306465 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50936329588 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3819910324 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.7 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.35 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.27373068433 328% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387352696737 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118561678871 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129453624631 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23925245835 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661350937411 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.