The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
How a nation would be defined as a ‘great’ nation? Is this definition termed on the basis of the number of achievements of the artists, scientists or a leader? Or is it defined by the conventional manner of living of its citizens? It is evident that a nation cannot be termed as great nation if there is a diffuse of disconcert among the people and has sultry of problems related to the people’s life, no matter how many successful artists, leader or scientists the country produces. Therefore, it is for sure that the people’s well being is a crucial indicator for the greatness of a nation.
A country marches towards progress with the support contributed by the nation’s citizens. And for that the well being of the people is necessary. A country suffering from poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, drought, famine, etc would result in failure for providing the helping hand for the overall nation’s development. Take for an example; if a major region of a country is facing poverty, the affected people would rather resort in unscrupulous means to make money. Unemployed people would have no other option than to getting lured by the criminal options in order to have monetary gains. Corruption would result is attenuating the government system instead of supporting the welfare of the population. Living in such country would no longer be safe for the citizens or also to the tourists visiting the country. The nation may boast several scientists, artists or ruler, but would their achievements help in improving the country’s image in the eye of the world? The answer to this would be a definite no. People judge greatness of a nation by the living condition and safety for everybody. Greatness of few people makes little or no contribution to the greatness of the nation.
In the world of science and technology, breakthrough made by the scientists of a nation cannot do much for the well being of the people unless the technology is made of use for improving the living conditions of the citizens of the nations. For example, if a team of scientists of a developing country makes a path breaking discovery in the field of generation of power, the nation would make sufficient progress only if the technology is applied for the power generation within the nation. Furthermore, if the country’s authorities fail to provide the required funds for further research, or if the team moves out to any developed country, then there would be no way the scientist’s achievement be able to contribute towards the progress of the nation.
In conclusion, it is prominent of say that, a nation is determined by its people. If the people are looked after well by their leaders and their welfare is taken into consideration whenever major political decision is been made, then it is evident that the nation will progress in the path which leads to greatness. This is because the well being of nation is directly proportional to its people’s welfare that constitutes the nation. The greatness of a nation cannot be determined by handful of people who have gained popularity and fame because of their achievements in the fields on science and technology or politics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
How a nation would be defined as a 'great' nation? Is this defin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2678.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0677068766 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437148217636 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8716238164 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.434782609 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1739130435 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188206581673 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721798316517 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609788694967 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140563376473 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700325648752 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.