As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There has been observed many advances and changes in human history that it would take forever to point them out. From lighting fire for cooking to having live video calls today, the world has made tremendous advancement in environmental as well as human nature. The author has quoted practically true statement that these days people have become more dependent on technology not only to solve problems but also to make living easier. This in turn has deteriorated human's ability to think for themselves as daily habit.
Even though technology acts as major helps us in our day to day life, this thing is also deteriorating our ability to think as well. Lets take a mundane example like daily grocery calculations at the grocery store; our thinking and calculation skills in making the addition of our bills have been replaced by calculators, our memorizing skills of remembering the names and the mobile numbers have been restricted by storing contact numbers in our mobile contacts, counting and paying the bills has been replaced by ATM card or Online cashless payments. It is clearly visible that technology has obstructed us from thinking for ourselves, rather than making us smarter.
Technology not only obturates us mentally, but it also affects us physically and that too could be on high level. It is an open fact that sticking to the couch all day in front of the TV is not a good sign of a healthy lifestyle. Technology, whether via TV, Computers, or mobile phones keeps us showing and attracting to all the things that amazes us. Tv shows plots up an interesting story which makes us sit and binge watch the shows or movies making us less active and incline towards being unhealthy. Excellent example would the kids who are continuously stuck to mobiles devices, iPad or even play station. This habit of sticking the technological things has restraint us from going out in the nature and be physically active. Hence technology certainly has deteriorated in making the living healthy by thinking about themselves.
Although, not to be completely against the technology, because it has definitely helped us in solving major problems, whether world problems or say pedestrian jobs, it has helped us in doing arduous tasks without carrying out any physical work. Lets take for an example, arduous task like mundane washing cloths has becomes stress-less because of a machine friend called washing machines, any human friend is far only by few touches pressed on your mobile phone, and many more. But this does deny the fact technology has declined us for thinking and acting up for ourselves.
In conclusion, even-though technology has been saving us ample of time and efforts, like every second side of the coin, technology has affected our inculcating habit of mind scratching in finding out solutions as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...riorating our ability to think as well. Lets take a mundane example like daily groce...
^^^^
Line 5, column 733, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...in the nature and be physically active. Hence technology certainly has deteriorated i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...without carrying out any physical work. Lets take for an example, arduous task like ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, so, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03191489362 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69079631141 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.6520113467 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.388888889 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61111111111 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128725061369 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476559109601 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433477091209 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778142557574 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490943622156 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.