Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present.
What is Learning? It is fundamentally a concept of acquiring a thorough knowledge of the facts and principles of the subject. How can someone acquire a thorough knowledge? Well, some of it is available to us found by predecessors or some we may need to explore it further. Hence, in my opinion, I strongly disagree with the given statement that Learning about the past has no value.
Learning is getting to know the ways of doing things the right way. Nobody is perfect as no one can do the things correctly in his/ her first attempt. Learning from the past would give us the suggestions and the advises on how to make things work. Let’s take a basic example of igniting a fire using stones. If a unconcerned person is asked to do so, he would be confused. But if someone, who has read about how the Stone Age man used to kindle the fire, he can create the fire with few minutes. Hence, when it comes to basic survival, people has tried many different ways during the course of the humankind, and learning about the past ways would definitely be at help in the present as well as in the future.
Secondly, Learning from the past could be time and effort saving when it come to making progress. Past knowledge and the past results of the ongoing theory or research is always of great help when people are currently working on it. For example, consider the telephones evolution. When telephonic conversation was invented, there were wired connection. Eventually scientists and researchers applied various features to the wired connection networks, and we are now able to connect with our friend or loved ones with wireless connection, like mobile phones, video calling which is nothing but the internet. All these inventions we are using today could not have been possible without the knowledge of the past related in this field.
To sum, knowing about the past methods, past discovered facts and the lessons learnt can immensely be helpful while living in the present or preparing for the future. Also, implementing the previous ways of working things out has the possibility to figure out the mistakes and help improve the results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'thorough knowledge'.
Suggestion: thorough knowledge
...of the subject. How can someone acquire a thorough knowledge? Well, some of it is available to us fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ple of igniting a fire using stones. If a unconcerned person is asked to do so, h...
^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...mes to basic survival, people has tried many different ways during the course of the humankind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...l, people has tried many different ways during the course of the humankind, and learning about the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the present as well as in the future. Secondly, Learning from the past could b...
^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...could be time and effort saving when it come to making progress. Past knowledge and ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'telephones'' or 'telephone's'?
Suggestion: telephones'; telephone's
...orking on it. For example, consider the telephones evolution. When telephonic conversation...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81571815718 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61673570752 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569105691057 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2359484394 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.85 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.45 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251033050688 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688585382708 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793583279752 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147605914765 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03357987406 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.