Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant number of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
The author makes a controversial statement in the terms of Arts field. The statement of suspending the government funding for arts would be extreme and would result in stagnation of art and new artists. Art is an integral part of any society and culture. Art represents the essence through its historical evolution of the place and so the country. And therefore, it is necessary for the nation to keep funding some amount to maintain the evidence and help emerging the local art. It is true that when significant amount of people are hungry and unemployed directing all the resources to their welfare make more sense. But the country suffering from circumstances should find a middle ground solution and maintain a good balance in fulfilling the citizen’s needs and appreciating the home-grown talent is of equal importance.
To begin with, the need of the citizen is of the utmost importance for any nation especially when there is a dearth of food and basic living amenities like job and shelter. But it is not viable for any nation to allocate all the expenses aimed only to alleviate these problems. Instead, the government should keep in mind various different aspects for a good country balance. Government should distribute the national funds equally to ensure the good reputation of national security, sports, education, law enforcement, global recognization and of course the art. These are only the few among the complete list. Growth is significant when there is a scope for development.
Moreover, Art can also prove to be a significant source of income. Many Roman, Greek and Chinese cities still attract many international tourists who like to be mesmerized by the historical art incorporated in ancient building and stored in museums. Whereas, countries like in Middle Eastern nations, only the welfare of the citizen of any country does not warrant the recognization at the global level. Because of their natural resources these country citizens live in affluent condition but are not idealized by any other country. On the other hand, countries like Germany, Greece, China and United States, who dexterously manages to keep balance in wealth and art, are widely idealized by other continents.
Furthermore, the combination that provides and guarantees that, as long as possible, people’s needs are considered first and then an impartial funding being provided to the development of skills in the field of art sounds way more solid as compared to the provided statement. However, certain extreme circumstances like famine, war and natural disasters are an exception. Countries facing such difficult situations can consider temporarily denying funds for any cause that might seem prodigal in such situations.
Conclusively, it is good to have a whole sum amount of resources allocated to upbringing the talent residing in any country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to emerge' or 'emerge'.
Suggestion: to emerge; emerge
...mount to maintain the evidence and help emerging the local art. It is true that when sig...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, of course, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2412.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26637554585 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9309866705 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3040741006 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333684802664 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878146458711 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697809547232 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160718587632 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133631012859 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.