Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Learning is a process of acquiring knowledge as well as understanding the reasons behind certain facts and methods. In order to completely understand any phenomenon, one must think on it and validate the understanding. The author presents an agreeable statement, in order to thoroughly assimilate the knowledge; one must bear the habit of skepticism by raising questions and doubts while in the process of learning. However, there comes down a condition on the level of education process one is going through; which will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First of all, learning begins as soon as human starts to grow. Take for an example, a non school going kid, is asked not to touch the fire, the kid would probably cast a doubt on why so; which is necessary because he should understand hazard of getting a burn. Further, a school going kid who is learning mathematics addition should understand the logic behind the numbers and addition. The one who asks the teacher on why 2 plus 2 gives us 4 and why not 5; answering this query by providing elucidation using various numbers would help the kid imbibe the concept of addition and would easily solve it anytime. Whereas, if any student who simply mugs up the information, without asking questions and getting his doubts clear, would end up having a knowledge with a hole. Hence, any student who is in the process of learning must get his understanding clear by putting forth the doubts to their respective educators.
Having doubts is a sign of pondering on why certain thing works in a known way. Raising questions is often a sign of intelligence and crave for learning more. Although, as students passes out school and enter the wide pool of knowledge in the universities, the learning gets widen and there could be enormous questions which probably, not every professor could be available to assist the students. In such situations, asking questions should not be hampered but rather find alternate ways to hunt the answers. In the modern world of internet and easy availability of wisdom, finding answers and elucidation of any given methods or concepts are only at the reach of our fingertips. Hence, students must have doubts and pursue answers in order to have full proof knowledge of certain subject. Getting the answers of the questions not only helps the students to better understand the subject, but also enhances their chances of relating the rhetorical concepts in the practical world efficiently.
Furthermore, let’s not forget the facts of the earlier scientists and inventors. Previously there were no given set of rules or regulations to formulate, neither was there any teacher to ask the doubts to. But this never stopped the human kind to make progress and uncover the reality of falsified facts. Let’s take for an example of Galileo, what if he never doubted on then blindly accepted fact of our planet Earth being flat? Probably we would not have learned that Earth is round rather being flat. Galileo’s skepticism helped human race to uncover the ultimate truth of our solar system. Hence, raising a doubt, finding its answer, getting the better in dept understanding ensures the full proof learning; may it be asking questions in the classroom, or a student working on finding answers in the University Library.
In conclusion, skepticism is sign of intelligence, which raises doubts and questions. While in the process learning, may it be at school/college or when working on any research, it is necessary to have doubts and queries rather than accepting it passively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 747, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'knowledge'.
Suggestion: knowledge
...g his doubts clear, would end up having a knowledge with a hole. Hence, any student who is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2985.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03372681282 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81879896414 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487352445194 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5362226839 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.807692308 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8076923077 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111360779681 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299664015905 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329280128484 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624817809945 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287074801424 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.