Students should always question what they are taught instead of just accepting it passively.
Students are always told to question when they are unable to comprehend the problem completely, asking question will help better understanding it or even solve the problem completely from the hint gained by questioning. It has been crucial part of academics to raise questions and find answers for that, leading to significant advancements and major breakthroughs in many fields. I completely agree with the argument of the author that student should always question what they are taught and not just accepting because it must have been right. For deeper understanding it is required to know mechanisms behind the concept also helping as feedback for teachers.
In the industries, deeper understanding of related concepts and mechanisms help to further optimize and mould into most efficient for particular use. Having knowledge of how it works and why it works, it will be proved to be very helpful in exploring advanced versions. For example, the student of computer science, having problem of limited memory and fast execution with relatively high accuracy would demand extensive and detailed knowledge of how memory works and how its operations can be optimized with better and faster algorithms. The Apollo Mission was conducted with significantly lower memory than today's smartphone, because it was optimized with great detailed knowledge.
Similarly, raised question by students, acts as feedback for the professor or the teacher, with the help of that one can try different approach for teaching that topic which would make it easy for student to understand. If students never raise any question, the teacher can not know when or where students are confused or not getting anything. Many questions will require many facts to evaluate the integrity in different contexts as well as with different perspective which would help significantly to gain insights. The theory should be linked with real world problems to understand usability as well as viability in the implementation.
In contrary, often there is a systematic path to gain any specific knowledge and skill. One can not directly master the skill without learning basic components and understanding how they can be used in combination with other elements to make certain thing. Before designing product for the customer, it is necessity that need should exist among the customers. Directly learning product design without understanding problem faced by the customers and features they want would eventually failed because the basic and most important components are missing. Similarly sometimes too much questioning attitude without some patience will degenerate into loss of interest.
Conclusively, questioning methods of teaching and what is being taught would be greatly beneficial to both students and professors serving as valuable feedback from student to the professor, would result into new approach and perspective to view the problem and therefore providing deeper insights and detailed knowledge, significantly helpful for the students. Sometimes it is also needed to trust specific path to learn new skill or understanding step by step having patience and persistence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chanisms behind the concept also helping as feedback for teachers. In the i...
^^
Line 13, column 488, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'fail'
Suggestion: fail
...and features they want would eventually failed because the basic and most important co...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... most important components are missing. Similarly sometimes too much questioning attitude...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y step having patience and persistence.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, therefore, well, even so, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51334702259 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91100045651 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511293634497 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4093556632 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.315789474 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6315789474 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197601580219 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658399901403 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105768547317 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121330215131 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101196336475 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.