Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Education is the basic tool to give knowledge and information. It shapes our thinking, attitude and perception of the world we are living in. The future of any person is defined by environment in which he grows up and what he learns in that environment. So, it is mandatory for any students to be cognizant about what he is being taught, rather than passively devouring the teachings.
In the modern era, education has been the most effective tool to shape the opinion of people. Using text books, the most used tool in education, many politicians and leaders are brainwashing minds of children; passively taking teachings in school they wouldn’t even know if they are being brainwashed. From their early childhood, students are fed with knowledge that their leaders want them to have, and that finally makes them obsequious to their respective leaders. North Korea, for instance, has its text books filled with the lessons fawning over their respective leaders. So, children are benighted about the cruelty of their dictator, and they become devoted to their leader. Had the students raised the question about the lessons they were behind taught in their school, they would have been aware about the cruelty that their society was facing.
In this regard, questioning of content and method of teachings is helpful for students to craft a beautiful future for themselves and sometimes even for their society. Moreover, being critical about the learning also helps in building up creativity in students as such action would polish their thinking and reasoning capabilities. Taking things passively doesn’t require any effort, and it would make our mind vapid.
The proponents of the above argument might argue that raising questions (denying passivity) would create unnecessary debate in class, and that would hinder teaching-learning process. But, doesn’t the debate help in bringing up different novel ideas on the issue being learned? Doesn’t it help in unfolding flaws in certain teaching that has been obscuring our mind? It obviously does. So, there is only one way that can truly enhance capacity of our mind and also point out flaws in education system: questioning the teachings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29943502825 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7326081044 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2300973826 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131514166476 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369928570775 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04711235601 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764992480201 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289211931476 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.