Professor's appearance on television.
Both the reading and lecture talks about university professors being on television. The reading states that professors, university and general public benefits from the professor's appearance on television. Whereas, the lecturer is doubtful on this statement and denies it by rebutting the claims.
First, the reading mentions that professors have many advantages which give them reputation as authorities in the academic field. When any professor gives out his views and knowledge on the television, thousands of people will able to watch it and they will get to know him as a scholar person. On the contrary, the lecturer rebuts this by saying that if a professor appears on the television, his reputation among his fellow teachers will be affected, and he will not be looked as a serious professor.
Secondly, the reading mentions that University would also benefit from its professor's visit on the television program. This would increase the University's publicity and eventually would gain more applications from students. Lecturer rebuts this point. She says that professor's time would be wasted in getting dressed for the show, preparing on what to present, and his presence would be unavailable in the campus or for the students. And this would affect his profession, by not getting invited to important meetings.
Lastly, the reading states that along with the Professor and the University, the General public also gains advantage when a professor makes appearance on the television. The article notes that the viewers gain knowledge and get exposed to ideas of what the scholar professors presents, which in reality the public would never have thought about it. The lecturer challenges this point. She says that television viewers are not interested in watching academic lecture; they are rather looking for entertainment.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubts on the every claim and theory presented in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... states that professors, university and general public benefits from the professors appearance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ty and general public benefits from the professors appearance on television. Whereas, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: Public
...h the Professor and the University, the General public also gains advantage when a professor m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82329923023 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504918032787 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3735759288 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.9375 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2550955601 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913397018594 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111160126863 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15428771113 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108609481834 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.