The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt says that, the surest indicator of the greatest nation is represented by general welfare of people instead of its achievements of ruler, artists, or scientists. In my not so humble opinion, I agree with the statement that greatest nation in represented by the general welfare of its people.
To begin with, general welfare of people tells us the nature of the people leaving in that country. If people in certain country are more involve in general welfare it shows their kindness and politeness. From this other nation can conclude that this country is friendlier and piece loving. For instance, in India there are many kind of religion and many kinds of people everyone have their own teachings but most common teaching is general welfare. Here people are always ready to help each other and more friendly so in whole world in spite of having world’s 6th largest army India is known as peace loving country.
However, achievements of great ruler, artists or scientist plays small role in forming the greatest nation but it does not make nation great. A great nation is represented by people living in that nation because nation is not only created by ruler, artist or scientist. Nation is build by the people living there. If people living in that nation is kind, humble, peace loving etc. Then that nation is said to be a great the nation. But on the other hand people living in certain nation are rude, violent than that nation not great nation even though that nation holds many achievements of ruler, artist or scientist. For instance, there are some nations who allow terrorist to leave within them; they support all activities of terrorist and in return terrorist plan death trap on neighbouring country. Such nations are not great nation.
Furthermore, by doing general welfare it shows that people of that nation are helping or bolstering their government in every possible way to work more efficiently and by doing so they are indirectly fostering the their government. For instance, there are many organization establish to help poor people or to give education to poor people they even provide health supplies, food, water to those people who need it when government fail to reach to them. This show kindness and humbleness of people living in that nation and such people plays important role in making nation great.
In conclusion, indicator of greatest nation is represented by nature and general welfare of the people more than the achievements of ruler, artist or scientist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...oving. For instance, in India there are many kind of religion and many kinds of people ev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
.... For instance, in India there are many kind of religion and many kinds of people ev...
^^^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
... doing so they are indirectly fostering the their government. For instance, there are man...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organization seems to be countable; consider using: 'many organizations'.
Suggestion: many organizations
...eir government. For instance, there are many organization establish to help poor people or to giv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... important role in making nation great. In conclusion, indicator of greatest nat...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the greatest'.
Suggestion: of the greatest
...on great. In conclusion, indicator of greatest nation is represented by nature and gen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99761904762 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51762382123 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438095238095 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3272492029 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.473684211 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32293603792 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134350826083 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960335843167 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228278742189 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107118434158 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.