Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate — and, perhaps, even cruel — to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claims is based.
When there is life there is will. Prompt suggest that nation should suspend government funding for arts when significant number of their citizen are hungry or unemployed. In my not so humble opinion, I mostly agree with the statement and the reason given to it that It is inappropriate and, perhaps, even cruel to use public resources to fund the art when people’s basic need are not being met for the following reasons.
To begin with, what is the use of the art when people are hungry and unemployed? Art should be given second preference after people’s life. It is blatant that if there are no people than there will be no one to praise the art. If people are dying due to hunger and employment then this shown status of that government. For instance, one can exemplify if government if funding more towards the art when there is huge number of unemployment and people are hungry than that government is not capable to run nation. First priority of every government is to look after their people and when all basic needs are fulfilled than they should work on other problems.
However, if government is ignoring people’s basic need than that government is in debacle and next time people will not vote for that government again. People pays their taxes only because they trust government that it will complete or provide them with basic need. But, if the government is wasting their money on unnecessary things then it is exacerbating the situation. For instance, if any government is doing so, people will start opposing that government and they will even start riots.
If government is indirectly forcing people to go bed hungry then it will increase crime cases in that nation.
Furthermore, if people are unemployed and hungry they will start doing illegal business to earn money and fill their family stomach. If this happens to be true then crime rate in that nation will burgeon and reputation of that nation in front of whole world will be collapse. Due to unemployment more people will go into the depression and frustration which will increase the number of suicide cases in that nation. It can be only avoided by fulfilling the basic needs of the people and for good government nothing is important than the life of the people.
To sum up, government should foster people’s basic needs. It should first focus on people’s need than it should invest funds on other things like arts because an art is also important but not important than people’s life and their basic needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
When there is life there is will. Prompt sug...
^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...stance, one can exemplify if government if funding more towards the art when there...
^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ernment and they will even start riots. If government is indirectly forcing people...
^^^^
Line 8, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... important than the life of the people. To sum up, government should foster peop...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an people’s life and their basic needs.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, then, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86511627907 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51913606453 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425581395349 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.495555356 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48699676689 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168709974067 0.0831039109588 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126059756818 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285553453897 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181246903501 0.0667264976115 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.