The topic raises the controversial issue whether teachers' salaries ought to base on the students' academic performance. Indisputably, the roles of teachers to build up new generations and they invest their effort to provide the reliable science. Hence, I totally disagree that depend on the students performance the teachers' salaries are based. However, to substantiate my case, this essay will elaborate my reasons and examples clearly.
To begin with, it is irrefutable the importance of education to build up well rounded generation that will enable them to hold the future on their shoulders. In addition, this system cannot become without outstanding teachers. In other words, teachers bear the largest part in the education system and they are qualified enough to make a crucial impact on their students. The striking quot on this introduction is "education is the movement from darkness to light". Thus, without teachers we cannot develop and move forward.
Furthermore, the second vital point the should be taken into account is there are myriad of methods to evaluate the teachers performance such as researches, ongoing observations and surveys that reflects real outcomes, because is not plausible to take students performance as a standard. Moreover, teachers have different degrees. For instance, we can find a teacher with a bachelor degree others have a master or a doctor degree. Consequently, their performance are varies and their outcomes will be different thus their salaries will vary.
Finally, from another angle, the contrary view says they have to assess students academic performance to identify the teachers' salaries. But the cardinal question here is all the students have the same level of intelligence?. In fact, there are different abilities some of them prefer math and there are super students while in the same time they are weak in art, Thus is it plausible that the math teacher has to take higher salary than the art teacher just because students are not interested in the art class?
All in all, due to aforementioned reasons and examples, students academic performance are not significant to determine the teachers' salaries and they have to assess teachers performance in reliable ways such as researches or surveys and to be aware about the teachers academic degree to identify the best salary for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
..., I totally disagree that depend on the students performance the teachers salaries are b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs we cannot develop and move forward. Furthermore, the second vital point the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...e are myriad of methods to evaluate the teachers performance such as researches, ongoing...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32352941176 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89084919447 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51871657754 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0053198923 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.117647059 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7647058824 5.21951772744 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217996694109 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069890083344 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498680333982 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131692598069 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493178031484 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.