Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Teachers are the most integral part of student life as they provide them with the gist of life by their experience and understanding a world as whole evaluating teacher and grading them accordingly seems illogical to me. Teachers are the human factor which cannot be able to replicate it result in similar way to the result in the previous year. Similarly student ability differ from the students in previous year. So by making consideration of salary according to the student performances seems illogical.
Traditional the only way to increase the pay scale was to take an advance degree, similarly most of teacher supplement their pay scale by working as a coach or advisor to school club or organization.
By making their pay scale according to the performance of students may lead to disparity in teacher and there might be chance of increase in misleading practices, taking an example of Georgia where in some district score of standardized test were increase by some teacher and principal to improve their reputation in community, so by making grading system for teacher their might be a chance of teacher practicing these types of practices to increase their pay scale.
In, industries were personnel are provided with appraisal to their work by grading them by their performance regarding sales, greater efficiency in work or by excellent track records, but in case of teacher were condition are different very single year and grading accordingly became arduous job for school authorities. Quality control of teachers seems impossible to elucidate in conditions that are so equivocal in sense.
Thirdly, grading help to increase the overall efficiency of teachers but it may inculcate the feeling of rancor in fellow member which may turns detrimental to school environment as whole.
As of now, teacher having similar qualification should be provided with same salary as differences in salary may leads to disparity in school, similarly may increase the sense of ill-will in fellow mates, it might increase the chance of mislead practices to gain more benefit and which eventually hamper the overall environment of school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'results'?
Suggestion: results
...or which cannot be able to replicate it result in similar way to the result in the pre...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...way to the result in the previous year. Similarly student ability differ from the student...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he sense of ill-will in fellow mates, it might increase the chance of mislead pra...
^^
Line 11, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mper the overall environment of school.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, third, thirdly, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24418604651 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84965430854 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485465116279 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.825120562 60.3974514979 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.4 118.986275619 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211240380544 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890387309917 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041843034735 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10698419915 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582304393851 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 14.1392134831 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 12.1743820225 145% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.