Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teachers are considered to be those individuals who step into a kid's life to guide them towards future success. A teacher is not only tasked with the educational development of a child but also developing the moral characteristics of a child. Owing to the importance of a teacher in a kid's life, teacher's salaries should be based upon their student's academic performance. I disagree with such a view point, since in my opinion, it does not do justice to the effort put in by teachers in developing a child's future. I will put forth, further reasoning behind my position in the paragraphs below.
We can all agree that each kid is different from another kid. A child might be a mathematics prodigy whereas another kid might excel in track activities. As a result, kids cannot be evaluated only upon their academic performance. If a bunch of kids excel in sports but fair poorly in academics, it does not mean that the teacher's salary should be reduced or that the teacher did not do their job adequately. Such a situation should make the school realize that kids should be placed into domains that they excel in. This would help the kids perform even better since they are pursuing a field of their own interest. Due to such an approach on the school's behalf, the performance of the kids will automatically improve and there would be no need to reduce the teacher's salaries.
Moreover, a fixed salary scheme helps the teachers, plan in advance, the activities they wish to perform next year. It might be the case that a teacher is waiting for her current year's salary so that she can add it to her savings and buy a house for herself. A steady stream of income helps the teachers, keep themselves motivated towards performing their job. On the contrary, if a few students do not perform well in their academics, because they did not put requisite efforts into their courses, will have a detrimental effect on the teacher's salary. She will pay the price for a mistake, she did not commit. Determining teacher's salaries with respect to the academic performance of their students does not do justice to the time a teacher put in towards educating their kids, and such a scheme could probably make teachers hate their jobs.
Proponents of the scheme would argue that such a scheme would ensure that teacher do not take a kid's future for granted. I agree that such an approach will ensure that teachers give their hundred percent while teaching the kids, but such a plan can sometimes lead to teachers facing the consequences of the mistakes that they did not commit. What if a group of students, who are not serious towards their academics, do not study properly for their exams, even though the teacher took special care to teach these kids adequately. This would mean that, in-spite of the teacher performing her task with utmost dignity, it is the students that are responsible for their own downfall, but it is the teachers who are facing the consequences of the kid's actions.
In sum, I am against the statement that teacher's salaries should be based upon their student's academic performance. In my opinion, teachers should not be scrutinized on the basis of how the kids perform, rather, it is ideal that independent committees are formed which will evaluate a teacher's performance, based on various factors that differentiate a good teacher form a bad one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...to be those individuals who step into a kids life to guide them towards future succe...
^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...ing to the importance of a teacher in a kids life, teachers salaries should be based...
^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...in academics, it does not mean that the teachers salary should be reduced or that the te...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...nterest. Due to such an approach on the schools behalf, the performance of the kids wil...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
..., will have a detrimental effect on the teachers salary. She will pay the price for a mi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ittees are formed which will evaluate a teachers performance, based on various factors t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2790.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 581.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80206540448 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66469975344 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438898450947 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 852.3 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8300838607 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2083333333 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273459852369 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930440600696 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672041215274 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18251143168 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504296292765 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.