Teacher's salary should be based on student's performance
Teaching is crucial to a nation’s development. Teacher has the responsibilities to educate and prepare the younger generation to organize the country in the future. Without a good education program, a country’s development may suffer greatly due to lack of skillful human resources. Despite the importance of teacher’s role, it is quite shocking that teacher’s salary is relatively low compared to other jobs that require the same amount of education. This will be even worse if teachers’ salaries have to be equaled with how well their students’ grades are.
Imagine that two teachers teach two different classes, where the first teacher teaches a class that has smart and hardworking students. While the second teacher has to deal with a class that most of the students are lazy and having average intelligence. The result will be obvious despite both teachers perform equally well. If the first teacher received higher compensation due to his/her students’ excellent performance, will it be fair for the second teacher? In conclusion, the student’s grade does not reflect how well the teacher’s performance is. Teacher’s performance indeed affects the student’s grade. However, student’s grade is mostly based on how big the student’s own effort.
Some people that support the idea of proportionating teacher’s salary with students’ academic performance might argue that such policy will encourage teacher to bring a better work ethic. However, such action might lead the teacher to focus on the student’s grade, not to the comprehension level of the students. In order to increase their salaries, teachers might give students more homework, which can lead to the increase of stress level among the students. This is definitely not the goal of the education system. The point of student coming to school is to understand the material and apply it in real life, not to get a bunch of A.
While the idea might seem interesting, it actually takes the benefits away from some teachers who have to instruct the not-so-great students. A better solution would be to adjust the teacher’s salary with the amount of work that s/he has to give. For example, a teacher who has more students with bad academic record, deserves a better pay grade.
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253246753247 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.140692640693 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0952380952381 0.0880659088768 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0411255411255 0.0497285424764 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0151515151515 0.0444667217837 34% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0800865800866 0.12292977631 65% => OK
Participles: 0.021645021645 0.0406280797675 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.25851855652 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0411255411255 0.030933414821 133% => OK
Particles: 0.0021645021645 0.0016655270985 130% => OK
Determiners: 0.101731601732 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0238095238095 0.0249443105267 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0238095238095 0.0148568991511 160% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2330.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 364.0 452.878318584 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.4010989011 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387362637363 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31043956044 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21978021978 0.200843997647 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137362637363 0.132149295362 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25851855652 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 57.2651510132 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7007833704 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.674092028746 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 49.243956044 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.8021978022 1.64882698954 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273317298038 0.391690518653 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152762388706 0.123202303941 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.108471057594 0.077325440228 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.541452385453 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114804171514 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13616288286 0.161403998019 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128092941601 0.0892212321368 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.528398250339 0.385218514788 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00758208979998 0.0692045440612 11% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206998383344 0.275328986314 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950867507522 0.0653680567796 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.