On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island's moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville's town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals.
The main idea of the claim is to limit the number of rented moped on Balmer island in order to decrease the accident that involves pedestrian and moped. This proposal is supported by the example of the neighboring island of Seaville that successfully decrease the moped accidents by limiting the number of rented moped. The argument, however, is invalid and lack of details to convince the reader.
First of all, the author did not clearly specify the common type of accidents that involve pedestrian and moped driver. The accident might be due to the pedestrian fault, not the moped driver. As we all know, some pedestrian ignores the traffic light and still crosses the street even though the pedestrian light has stop light turned on. If this was the case, the city should educate their pedestrian instead of limiting the number of moped.
Additionally, the author does not give a detail description of Balmer island’s road structure. There is a possibility that pedestrian has to share the road with moped driver. Such policy will create a hazardous driving condition and thus causing more accidents. To solve this issue, the city should improve their traffic policy and not limiting the number of rented moped.
Finally, the Seaville’s town case could not be a perfect example. It might be true that Seaville’s moped accident decreased by limiting the rented moped. However, that might not be the perfect solution. By referring to the second and third paragraph of my essay, the cause of moped incident might be due to the disobedient pedestrian or other cause.
While it is true that the city has to secure every road user, they should use reasonable and justified reasoning to execute any new policy. The city should not apply an unclear policy that still need more research on, or else the existing problem would not be solved.
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'first of all', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238636363636 0.25644967241 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.15625 0.15541462614 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.09375 0.0836205057962 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0596590909091 0.0520304965353 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0198863636364 0.0272364105082 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0823863636364 0.125424944231 66% => OK
Participles: 0.0397727272727 0.0416121511921 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61290521704 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0284090909091 0.026700313972 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.130681818182 0.113004496875 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.03125 0.0255425247493 122% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0170454545455 0.0127820249294 133% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1860.0 2731.13054187 68% => OK
No of words: 310.0 446.07635468 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.57801047555 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.374193548387 0.378187486979 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251612903226 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.167741935484 0.208842608468 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103225806452 0.135150697306 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61290521704 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 207.018472906 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496774193548 0.469332199767 106% => OK
Word variations: 49.8506443771 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2352941176 23.2022227129 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1015006089 57.7814097925 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.411764706 141.986410481 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 23.2022227129 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.724660767414 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 43.3965844402 51.9672348444 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.53012048193 1.8405768891 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50326284139 0.441005458295 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142405663908 0.135418324435 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.094812518722 0.0829849096947 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626317957394 0.58762219726 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128887116198 0.147661913831 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236024499022 0.193483328276 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120406381759 0.0970749176394 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.415217179838 0.42659136922 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128314292352 0.0774707102158 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351397603442 0.312017818177 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110469457971 0.0698173142475 158% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.