As we know that each person is unique in himself/herself. Each person has its own thought process or ideas regarding with any pursuit in the society. The idea which is correct or valid according to me, it might or might not be supported by others. It does not mean that those who conform to their ideas irrespective of listening other's decision are always going to leave a lasting legacy. I strongly disagree with this statement as mentioned by author for the following reasons.
Some people are very confident of their ideas or thought process behind the project. If someone tries to pinpoint them or raise doubt on their thought process, it would hurt their ego. Such person will never attempt to seek out the hidden flaw in their hypothesis or premise which would deter them to achieve their correct goal or target.
I think such person can not be successful who is not ready to listen other's doubts or criticism on their work or on their notions. To illustrate, when a researcher presents his theory or research in front of public, if he would not answer the questions or doubts raised on his theory by other scholars and he remains stick to his ideas irrespective of its veracity, it will impede the progress of invention in the long run.
Similarly, literature work of scholars are reviewed by others scholars. It is true that reviewing may result in criticism or praise. Sometimes, it happens that due to the influential worth of the author's work , he/she is disliked by his/her competeitors. But it will not imply that author's work is not worth to read or up to the mark. Readers may still praise his/her work. Sometimes, jealousy factor of the people who raise doubts or show apprehensions comes into the picture which compel them to do so. But it does not state that author should change his ideas. He still remains intact to his/her theory and excels in his/her goal. He still truimphs the entire world and makes a impact in the society. It reveals that it depends upon context to context that one should follow one's idea or change it according to the apprehensions raised by others. It is very subjective in nature. Thus i reject this sttement.
Copernicus had concluded that the sun is situated at the center of the universe rather than the earth. He was criticized by the chruch. After his death, his theory proved to be correct. His laws in physics are example of this. He made a long lasting mark in the society. Thus, the statement of the author is not generalized. It varies according to person and situation. Therefore, I strongly reject this statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As we know that each person is unique in h...
^^
Line 6, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he influential worth of the authors work , he/she is disliked by his/her competeit...
^^
Line 6, column 680, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ill truimphs the entire world and makes a impact in the society. It reveals that ...
^
Line 6, column 779, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ntext to context that one should follow ones idea or change it according to the appr...
^^^^
Line 6, column 884, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...thers. It is very subjective in nature. Thus i reject this sttement. Copernicus h...
^^^^
Line 6, column 889, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
.... It is very subjective in nature. Thus i reject this sttement. Copernicus had...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, i think, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75946547884 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57891641519 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496659242762 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7734044972 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2333333333 118.986275619 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.9666666667 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76666666667 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201028070998 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452008453419 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685344483231 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113187391464 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502573644966 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 48.8420337079 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.1743820225 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.