Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Achieving something great in any field requires relentless hardwork and perseverance, along with a belief in oneself that drives one to success despite the reception it gets from others. Groundbreaking ideas are often put down by people who fail to see the potential they exhibit. Looking at our past tells us that most people who have left a lasting legacy did so in the face of extreme criticism or persecution. Humans are inherently inertiatic and so anyone who tries something new tends to face resistance.
Historically, there have been numerous cases where the people we today admire took flak from the public at the time. Galileo, for instance, was severely condemned for suggesting that the Earth is not the centre of the galaxy. His idea, that the Earth was just one of the many planets revolving around the Sun was not taken kindly by the conservative institutions. He also debunked the myth of the Earth being flat. By seeing through and defending his findings, he ensured that they were noticed by like-minded people in the future and ultimately proven correct.
Similarly, Nikola Tesla even faced violent criticism when he discovered alternating current, and appeared as a competitor against Thomas Edison. Supporters of Edison tried their best to suppress the invention, but the superior nature of the current when compared to the then existing direct current could not help but get noticed widely. This shows that not giving up in an essential quality
On the other hand, any constructive criticism should not be ignored, but rather understood in order to improve upon an idea. An iteration of feedback and improvements is essential to any process. There have also been cases where ideas have failed because of improper execution. As is the case with monarchies very often, the central authority refuses to listen to advice and ends up as a failure.
In summary, it is undoubtedly important to move forward even while others express criticism. But at the same time any positive feedback should be judged carefully and followed if possible. Tireless effort in all circumstances, along with openness to suggestions is paramount to leaving a lasting legacy in any field.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, similarly, so, then, while, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11977715877 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77034588155 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623955431755 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5811634459 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180799392622 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454606500651 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451117118693 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825029784987 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541949867728 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.