The true test of the greatness of a work of art is its ability to be understood by the masses.
The statement asserts that the greatness of a work of art is based on the ability to be understood by the masses. But the statement is not always true. There are many instances where the art is not understood by many but lauded by the critics for its creativity.
Firstly, there are many pieces of art that are critically acclaimed all around the world but different people have different interpretations about the art. For example, lets take the paintings and art work of Picasso, who was a great artist, most of his work is eccentric and enigmatic because of his creativity. Still people consider his artwork with high regard. Even nowadays, when people see a great painting they call it a Picasso. So the understandability of the artwork does not represent its greatness.
Secondly, when we consider music, they are multifarious ranging from rock to hip-hop and they are present in many different languages. There are many instances where people liked the song even though they did not understand the language. For instance, in the recent years, a Spanish song named 'Despacito' became very famous all around the world and most people who did not understand the song also liked it.
Furthermore, there are many more artforms where the understandability plays a major role. Lets take the early 19th century plays where most people disliked them. For example, Shakespeare's plays were disliked by many because they were long and boring. But these plays were appreciated by the critics. Even today those plays are treated with great respect.
Finally, we can come to a conclusion from the above examples that the statement given above is not always true and the ability of understanding plays a minor role describe the greatness of the artwork.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rock to hip-hop and they are present in many different languages. There are many instances whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e understandability plays a major role. Lets take the early 19th century plays where...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00684931507 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75067162852 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489726027397 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.180629262 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215394985148 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729501749446 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103810145069 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143756718241 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144025881789 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.