The following editorial appeared in the Broomall County Times Picayune The Gordon Act which established a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp is currently up for reauthorization The act prohibits the building of roads or cutting of old growth trees in t

Essay topics:

The following editorial appeared in the Broomall County Times-Picayune:

"The Gordon Act, which established a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp, is currently up for reauthorization. The act prohibits the building of roads or cutting of old growth trees in the swamp, though it permits hunting. Many blamed logging activities for the decline of the bird population, especially that of the dappled grackle. The grackle population has continued to decline since the passage of the law, demonstrating that the Gordon Act has not been sufficient to protect the species. Another nearby refuge, the Wayne County Marsh Habitat, bans all mining, logging, and hunting. Wayne County officials have not reported a decline in the grackle population there. This proves that hunting, not logging, was responsible for the population drop in Broomall County. Thus, Broomall County should not reauthorize the Gordon Act unless it is amended to include the same provisions as those in Wayne County."

The editorial that appeared in the newspaper asserts that the decline of the grackle population in Broomall County is because of the logging activities that happen in the wildlife refuge and Wayne County Marsh habitat's grackle population is stable because they prohibited logging. But this statement alone doesn't aver that the population decrease because of the logging.

Firstly, hunting is allowed in the Big Dark Swamp and hunters will not only hunt animals, they might hunt birds also. So it could be a reason the the decrease in the grackle population. However, in Wayne County, hunting is also prohibited. Since there is no hunting there the grackle population didn't reduce.

Secondly, because of the hunting in the Broomall Country, the birds the wildlife refuge might move to the neighboring county seeking shelter. So the population grackle of the Wayne County might increase since they moved there. Therefore, reducing the population of grackle in Broomall County.

Furthermore, the wildlife conditions in Wayne County might have suited the grackle population more than the Broomall County. So the Wayne County may have more wildlife population compared to the Wayne County.

Finally, it can be concluded from the above examples that logging is not the only reason for the decrease of grackle population in the wayne county and other reasons such as hunting, and wildlife habitat could also be a reason for the population decrease.

Votes
Average: 5.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...bited logging. But this statement alone doesnt aver that the population decrease becau...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...nly hunt animals, they might hunt birds also. So it could be a reason the the decrea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...unt birds also. So it could be a reason the the decrease in the grackle population. How...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...unt birds also. So it could be a reason the the decrease in the grackle population. How...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...yne County, hunting is also prohibited. Since there is no hunting there the grackle p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...no hunting there the grackle population didnt reduce. Secondly, because of the hun...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 55.5748502994 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 231.0 441.139720559 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29437229437 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56203920768 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 204.123752495 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437229437229 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 71.2552142342 57.8364921388 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.916666667 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 5.70786347227 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11891718727 0.218282227539 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486225225704 0.0743258471296 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452658512268 0.0701772020484 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762763771047 0.128457276422 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260946675346 0.0628817314937 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 98.500998004 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

No. of Words: 233 350
Minimum 250 words wanted

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 233 350
No. of Characters: 1186 1500
No. of Different Words: 97 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.907 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.09 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.492 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 96 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.492 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.476 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.708 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.173 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5