“A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.”
The statement asserts that all the students in a nation should study the same national curriculam until they reach their college. This may be useful for some, but when we take the nation as a whole there will be a lot of antithetical arguments based on this issue.
Firstly, when we instantiate a national curriculam for all the schools, then eveyone in the school are forced to study the same subjects. Some might be interested in them but others might not be interested in them. This might hinder the students ability to study the subject with full efficacy. For instance, when we take the country India they have instutited a national curriculam called CBSE, which is followed by most schools around India, this curriculam states that all students are supposed to study the same subject until the 10th grade, as a result most of the students find it hard.
Secondly, when the national curriculam is followed every student is forced to study the same subjects and we have no insight of what the curriculam covers. The students who is more foucused on a sports related, photography career or any other non-study related carrer are also forced to study them, eventually reducing the freedom of the student. If the students take a college major that is not covered in the national curriculam, it will be difficult for them during their college tenure.
Furthermore, when all the students are studying the studying the same subject, the chances of malpractices increases. For example, when the students sitting next to each other in an examination hall sit know what subject they are writing and the type of questions they will be facing before hand, then they tend to copy more. Therefore, the inigilators should be more meticulous during the examinations.
Finally, we can come to a conclusion for the above examples that the national curriculam might be beneficial for some but not for everyone. When we use this format for a long term, the student's future might not be bright.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...terested in them. This might hinder the students ability to study the subject with full ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a sport' or simply 'sports'?
Suggestion: a sport; sports
...s. The students who is more foucused on a sports related, photography career or any othe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'studying the'.
Suggestion: studying the
... Furthermore, when all the students are studying the studying the same subject, the chances of malpractic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
...e type of questions they will be facing before hand, then they tend to copy more. Therefore...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9255952381 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60950473305 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488095238095 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4532344036 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.214285714 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 5.21951772744 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257067163737 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114847699299 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981599007852 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17102719115 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750787511585 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.