To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A society is something-which integrates the flamboyant lifestyle of the rich, satisfactory lifestyle of middleclass and the lugubrious life of the helpless poor-and portrays itself as a single unified component. And such an abstruse concept called 'society' cannot be completely studied by mere analysis of the major cities alone.
This is an issue which has garnered attention since a long period of time where erudite scholars have focussed exclusively on the major cities for the characterization of a society while the liberals and activists have been dengrating such a characterization which does not account for the unheard pains of the society which reside in the minor cities. The major cities with flourishing job opportunities, educational schools and institutions account for a majortiy of the society, or to be precise, represent only the earning sector of the society. The unemployed people and the poor who have not been able to fetch a-meal-a-day for them have been mercilessly ostracised from these places and thrown into locations where their voices are unheard. This leaves their culture unnoticed, sufferrings unlearnt and rights ungranted! And these places mostly happen to be the minor cities of the society. This shows how misleading the characterization of a society could probably be if it does not account for the minor cities.
While the erudite scholars propund to exclude the minor cities which represents the poor and helpless masses quoting that they happen to be just a nominal 10% of the society. But they have seldom pondered about the consequences of these superficial characterization. Unemployment leads to accretion of population, with the result of demand augmenting supply exponentially over a period of time. Today's 10% might become tomorrow's 30% and so on. With the futile attempts to reconcile to the unemployed phase of life, these sector might resort to any means to fulfill their subsistence. And woudlnt such a nontrivial act change the way the society has been portrayed or mislead the reader about the phase ? The answer clearly would disabsue the erudite scholars who oppose the inclusion of minor cities in characterizing a society.
Notwithstanding accounting for the majority of the society by suverying the major cities, the actual pain and culture of the society might still be left unheard without accounting for the minor cities. This passage therefore opines the mandatory inclusion of the minor cities in the thorough scavening and analysis of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ich has garnered attention since a long period of time where erudite scholars have focussed ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... augmenting supply exponentially over a period of time. Todays 10% might become tomorrows 30% ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sector' or 'these sectors'?
Suggestion: this sector; these sectors
...oncile to the unemployed phase of life, these sector might resort to any means to fulfill th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3391959799 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03128040195 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505025125628 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1776727832 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.8125 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123884565319 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405527807429 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358601940866 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797250412583 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302132553885 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.