Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev

Essay topics:

Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Crucial to fostering a pragmatic examination to decipher the boons and perils of technology, a spate of news articles have recently polarised people on the whether techological advances have outweighed its insidious effects or not. The fact that technology has not only ameliorated the standards of our life but has also simplified it immensly is absolutely indisputable.

Ranging from online educational expert lectures/coaching which has made it possible is disseminate knowledge even to the benighted masses of the globe to the usage of techology to send rovers to Mars, technology has become ubiquitos and an integral part for the development of mankind. It is this technology which engenders a platform for scientific innovations and breakthrough. Could a cure for the fatal disease of Cancer, which wiped away several thousands ruthelessly, be discovered in the absence of technology? It was advent of innovation in medical technology and discovery of new innoculations would could provide a solution for the insidious disease. There is a myriad of such examples which could be inferred.

While sceptics point out the flawed aspects of technology excoriating the adverse effects the advancing technology has been inflicting on the present generation. It's true that the high tech radiation signals, the so called 5G and 4G, have proven inimical to the bird masses and has even played a vital role in the substancial decrease of migratory bird populace. They also add on by pointing that the same technology has led to exposure of teenagers to obscene and vulgarity which has brought a cultural declivity in the society.

Erudite scholars have clearly attributed the so called pernicious effects of technology to the misuse or overuse of it. The tenuous claim of bird deaths leaves the hidden truth behind it unnoticed. It is the commmercial competition between the network companies which has made them flout the law by increasing the frequency of their towers and hence causing the signals to be dangerous to birds. Similarly, uncontrolled and unmonitored internet usage premitted to teenagers has led them astray. This passage alludes how the negative effects of technology is not due to technology rather due to its untamed and selfish usage.

Therefore, it can be indubitably inferred from the above passages that technology has succeded in making mircales come true, from saving lifes to fostering development, while their negative effects can be stemmed by checking the lax Government policies and ordinances.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disseminated'.
Suggestion: disseminated
.../coaching which has made it possible is disseminate knowledge even to the benighted masses ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h examples which could be inferred. While sceptics point out the flawed aspects o...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36432160804 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03877307718 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570351758794 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4810195551 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.4375 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0868042403004 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316915798198 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305457322943 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464918599813 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284504073172 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 11.8971910112 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.