To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Social traits, which is including a variety of aspects from entertainment to business, are built by those who consist of society. Some are dubious about how the limited number of cities can represent the significant social traits as the way people live is affected by various factors such as environment and average income levels. However, there are several powerful reasons to conduct research on large cities to understand major social characteristics.
Firstly, entertainment facilities are not evenly distributed across a country, but unevenly placed, especially more in big cities. The primary purpose of those facilities such as museums and concert halls is to convey one’s ideas or opinions in various ways from paintings to musicals. In order to efficiently achieve this goal, it is important to gather as many people as possible, and the major cities are great places compared to other parts. Once they are conveyed, it is discussed among those customers and they reproduce the culture by adding their own ideas to the original ones. This is how social traits are constructed in society. It demonstrates great accessibility to entertainment grants them more chances to create social characteristics.
Secondly, most large companies are placed in major cities leading the society’s business traits. Companies are eager to make a profit by selling their products or services to various customers. Since it is time-consuming and inefficient to customize everything one by one, they try to reflect the prevailing social trends to maximize their possibilities of success. For instance, Seoul is one of the biggest cities with a glut of well-known companies in Korea. As it is always crowded with various range of ages, the companies have a lot greater chances to observe the possible target customers than those in others. For the advantage of easy accessibility to society, many companies hope to move their companies to the city if their financial states allow. It clearly explains major cities are where beneficial to study prevalent social characteristics.
The opposite opinion with this article cannot be completely ignored. However, they are more likely to focus on the possible varieties in a society depending on one’s own circumstances. If the study is aiming to analyze the major social traits, they need to find the solutions in the large cities as many entertainment facilities and companies are gathered there.
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams Realty is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only 53
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 50
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- A person should never make an important decision alone 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33766233766 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99321321492 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9537406411 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.157894737 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134516469966 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440797453028 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387765903896 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081776047139 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272920791055 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.