Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Many would assert understanding the past is of little use to those in current position of leadership because recent days are deem advanced and mercurial compared to the past. Yet, I still believe the past sublimes enormous lesson for every human, and especially for those in current positions need to deliberate the lessons from the past in order to lead the group well. I am going to delineate to espouse my argument.
Relying on and understanding the past might be furitive when people face unfamiliar situations because no one has experienced anything before and comparision between the current issue and the past is not going to be reliable. For example, our ongoing pandemic - COVID, we call this as "new normal," which implies that the world never underwent similar situations and people are asked to find out the new solution on our own. Even more, Spain Flu or any previous pandemic cannot account for any of our situations because the modern days are ridiclously different than the previous history. COVID-19 took only few days to get disseminated through vehicles such as airplane while the previous pandemic instilled slower. These situations indicates that understanidng the past is not helpful and efficient to solve the current problems.
Notwithstanding the fact that some cases are not reliable based on the understanding the past, this is not always correct. Those examples are dramatic situations which we do not encounter daily, though we still suffering from COVID-19. In terms of smaller scale, people do need to reflect the previous history and need to get the lesson from it in order to head right path. The Stock market is embodiment of the great reason why people need to study the history. Stock market is fluctating all the time and no one can predict the correct answers. Neverthless, the financial market still has numerous jobs for stock market and try their best to predict the upcoming trend. The most efficient and reliable method to comprehend the future trend is relfecting on previous history because stock market trend shows similar graph trends for long-term.
In addition, people of leadership positions need to be assured that they understand and apply the previous history to the current so as to thwart any mistakes and remind the original purpose of their own insitutions. In case of companies who are abrogated completely in history, most of cases were due to they lost their original vision, and it led the bankruptcy. For example, there is one company in Korea, which introduced to customers along spreading their core belief which is cheap and good quality food. However, as time passed, the company started to lost in track and sold foods with higher price and lower quality. Eventually, the company is about to insolvent. The lesson the leadership positions need to consider is they need to always remind themselves with the past.
To sum up, despite many argues that understanding the past is little use to those in current positions of leadership, I content it is really crucial to recall and understand the previous history in order to engender the better outcome and always lead the their group to right way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deemed'.
Suggestion: deemed
...n of leadership because recent days are deem advanced and mercurial compared to the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... COVID, we call this as 'new normal,' which implies that the world never und...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...e modern days are ridiclously different than the previous history. COVID-19 took onl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'indicate'.
Suggestion: indicate
...emic instilled slower. These situations indicates that understanidng the past is not help...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ply the previous history to the current so as to thwart any mistakes and remind the orig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the cases') or simply say ''most cases''.
Suggestion: most of the cases; most cases
...ho are abrogated completely in history, most of cases were due to they lost their original vi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...nder the better outcome and always lead the their group to right way.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, really, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2658.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06285714286 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67495291019 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491428571429 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5058323619 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.818181818 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8636363636 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329972972897 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091318149123 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150200756551 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237475584717 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181383570326 0.0667264976115 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.