Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s

Essay topics:

Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

gg

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had done'?
Suggestion: had done
...ways look up to thinking that what if I would have done something differently. For leaders it i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1074, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...h keeping a significant weight on their past experiences. Not only understanding their past e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...iences. Not only understanding their past experience, a leader should always understand past...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, really, so, then, well, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 107.0 58.6224719101 183% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3008.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 628.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7898089172 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00598923014 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82104959207 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441082802548 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 919.8 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7508509451 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.32 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.12 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200023476424 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705534835035 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799675315805 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143078652221 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673757856411 0.0667264976115 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had done'?
Suggestion: had done
...ways look up to thinking that what if I would have done something differently. For leaders it i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1074, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...h keeping a significant weight on their past experiences. Not only understanding their past e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...iences. Not only understanding their past experience, a leader should always understand past...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, really, so, then, well, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 107.0 58.6224719101 183% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3008.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 628.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7898089172 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00598923014 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82104959207 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441082802548 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 919.8 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7508509451 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.32 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.12 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200023476424 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705534835035 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799675315805 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143078652221 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673757856411 0.0667264976115 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.