Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. I disagree with the statement. Understanding the past is essential in every sphere of life. It makes us look at the mistakes done by our ancestors and not to repeat them. Moreover, We get an idea of how the hardships were encountered by our previous generations and how they had encountered them. When someone is in politics, it is essential for a particular leader to know the history of the past leaders. They should be aware of the contributions made by them through the movements and their struggle in bringing freedom to the country. If we are in research whether it is in the disciple of science or arts, a researcher should read all the research made to the particular subject taken by him, looking at the past gives him/her the exposure of the varieties of the work done in the respective field. It will give the researcher many innovative ideas that are different from past research and to take that innovative idea as part of his/her research.
Studying past theories in science acquaints us with all the theories made up to the present. It gives exposure to us to take out the flaw or shortcomings present in them. The flaw or shortcomings in past theories motivates others to think out of the box and to discover something new. We can impart new changes to past technology if and only if we have studied the past technologies and theories behind past technologies.
Every new discovery is a consequence of past discoveries. It is very essential to study the past in the current position of leadership. The current position of the leadership word is ambiguous here. It may be the medicine field, politics, or Computer field. In all these fields it is necessary to study past to make progress in the current sphere of life.
But there are some fields like music profession or sports profession, in all these positions one need not study the past. We can get expertise in respective fields by practicing more and more. One should not exert energy in studying the history of music or the respective sports. In all these fields there is nothing to be done innovatively. and new.
I think that understanding of the past depends on the profession or type of current position of leadership. Therefore, I reject the statement mentioned by the author that understanding of the past is of little use to the current position of leadership.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rogress in the current sphere of life. But there are some fields like music pro...
^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ere is nothing to be done innovatively. and new. I think that understanding o...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing to be done innovatively. and new. I think that understanding of the past d...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79809976247 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89680483804 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427553444181 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5515643414 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194138406569 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768688007348 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101886809239 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134484179186 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928531234704 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.