"Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image."
-
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In an era of information technology where social media has become a tool in the hands of virtually the majority, including recruiting organizations, accessing once profile or information about any prospective applicant in job process has become less difficult. One prospective employer can just sit at his comfort zone and access information or data he needs about his future employees. While social media platforms are sometimes laced with concocted and unfound polished information about some of these applicants, the vast usefulness is unquantifiable. The platform does not just give the information an employer needs to access a potential employee, it assist in reducing the number of shortlisted candidates which are usually more than the required. For example, in the recruitment conducted by a certain company in central Nigeria, most of those who scaled through the first altitude test all have substantial social media presence. This helps to explain how an appealing imagine can be more helpful in a contemporary society.
In addition, presenting oneself with superb qualities has equally aided politicians in winning elections. In this so-called game of politics, the masses tend to be attracted more to people's public display than by their true nature as future leaders. So, it is convenient to lie and win election than to say the truth and fail; this is the new normal in our modern society. Take for example in recent campaigns in countries like the United States, the successful candidate amongst the two major contenders lied his way to the the top by even denying the indisputable climate science. In so doing, he has presented a false image to the appeal of the public which thus earn his votes.
However, securing any country against external aggression is usually one of the primary responsibilities of any government in modern society. Mostly popular government, including those who practice liberal democracy have taken advantage of this fake public posturing in their fight against insecurity like terrorism. One of the ways in which government garner information and profiling of potential terrorists treats is through individual posturing and dispositions both in public and online. A person who may not be profile whereas in reality, he is not dangerous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 657, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assists'?
Suggestion: assists
...eeds to access a potential employee, it assist in reducing the number of shortlisted c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...he two major contenders lied his way to the the top by even denying the indisputable cl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...he two major contenders lied his way to the the top by even denying the indisputable cl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dern society. Mostly popular government, including those who practice liberal dem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33149171271 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9740029229 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0557052974 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121625756197 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400924147991 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435275870884 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733539943652 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308773956497 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.