Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
I believe that the colleges or universities should require students to participate other field classes in the first year, but not necessarily force them after that.
Studying across different field could be advantageous, since they apparently not only benefit expanding knowledge, but also consider another possibility for changing field. By taking other field classes, students are able to learn various concepts or skill in different ways and learning beyond major subject sometimes help a lot to solve the problem that pupils encounter in their field. For example, building architecture usually reply on intricate mathematical calculation and physical evaluation. Besides, medicine development counts on not only biology but also chemistry. Therefore, knowledge is borderless nowadays and they are interdependent. Moreover, some students do not exactly make their mind to choose major subject because they rush to make decision before universities without adequate understanding. By letting pupils contact with other fields, the school provides the possibilities for students to explore more subjects that they don’t know and maybe they’ll find what really interests them. For instance, In Taiwan, there are 3 to 5 percent of students changing their major after the first year in the college because they find more intriguing subjects. And It’s school’s responsibility to help students grow their talent or ability development.
Opponents may argues that not every school is affordable to provide diverse courses for those students to attend. They needs to recruit more teachers and buy more equipment and it cost lots of money. Besides, only minor group of students would change their major to others, the school is not worth to invest. Under such circumstance, If the schools want to provide various courses and force students to participate, then it wouldn’t be pragmatic. However, I believe that academies would not necessarily expand their departments or increasing faculties due to the policy, the could easily achieve simply by freeing the accessibility for students to choose classes in other colleges when they’re the first year in the universities. For example, say a small-scale engineering school which obviously does not have the ability to offer literal class for students could coordinate with other literal schools. Some academies could collaborate together so that pupils could select comprehensive classes from these schools. For instance, in Taiwan, there is a system composed of three universities and the freshmen could freely choose courses. By coalition of schools, it saves a great deal of money.
Additionally, students tend to start paying attention to their major or others related to that when they’re not no longer freshmen in the college. Because courses’ complexity is higher and more difficult starting from second year, the school should not set a mandatory criteria for them to participate irrelevant class, but holding a liberal attitude toward it. In other words, pupils could either attend interesting classes or fully focus the major subject. By providing the flexibility, the school would achieve more than diverse academic development.
In conclusion, A compromising decision is suggested for the colleges to be done as a mandatory requirement for students to attend other field course only in the first year to benefit knowledge breadth and major changing possibilities. Meanwhile, schools are unnecessary to pay extra money by coalition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to major'
Suggestion: to major
...o not exactly make their mind to choose major subject because they rush to make decis...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1064, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'percents'?
Suggestion: percents
...r instance, In Taiwan, there are 3 to 5 percent of students changing their major after ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...rses for those students to attend. They needs to recruit more teachers and buy more e...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
..., the school should not set a mandatory criteria for them to participate irrelevant clas...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3002.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63227016886 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99018949317 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519699812383 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8240641948 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.08 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.32 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205165489516 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603815655972 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623230092183 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14435482869 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555025260855 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.